Abstract. Bipolar argumentation frameworks have been instrumental in captur-ing the notion of support between arguments. However, some of their semantics are counterintuitive in situations regarding evidential reasoning, and we extend them to account for this. To account for our long term research goals, we also up-date Bipolar argumentation frameworks to be able to handle support and attack by multiple argument in the same style as Nielsen’s work.
International audienceIn the context of bipolar argumentation (argumentation with two kinds of inter...
Arguably the significance of an abstract model of argumentation depends on the range of realistic in...
International audienceGradual semantics are now well-studied in the computational argumentation lite...
Abstract. Bipolar argumentation frameworks have been instrumental in captur-ing the notion of suppor...
International audienceDifferent abstract argumentation frameworks have been used for various applica...
International audienceIn this article, we propose a survey of the use of bipolarity in argumentation...
International audienceIn this paper, we propose a survey of the use of bipolarity in argumentation f...
The process of arguing is also the process of justifying and explaining. Transparent reasoning proce...
The process of arguing is also the process of justifying and explaining. Here, we focus on argumenta...
Bipolar argumentation frameworks enable to rep-resent two kinds of interaction between argu-ments: s...
Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (BAF) are a natural extension of Dung’s Argumentation Frameworks (A...
This paper presents a formal approach to explaining change of inference in Quantitative Bipolar Argu...
Dung's original argumentation frameworks have been extended in various ways. One such extension intr...
Bipolar argument graphs represent the structure of complex pro and contra arguments for one or more ...
Abstract. The identification of consistent sets of arguments is one of the most im-portant concerns ...
International audienceIn the context of bipolar argumentation (argumentation with two kinds of inter...
Arguably the significance of an abstract model of argumentation depends on the range of realistic in...
International audienceGradual semantics are now well-studied in the computational argumentation lite...
Abstract. Bipolar argumentation frameworks have been instrumental in captur-ing the notion of suppor...
International audienceDifferent abstract argumentation frameworks have been used for various applica...
International audienceIn this article, we propose a survey of the use of bipolarity in argumentation...
International audienceIn this paper, we propose a survey of the use of bipolarity in argumentation f...
The process of arguing is also the process of justifying and explaining. Transparent reasoning proce...
The process of arguing is also the process of justifying and explaining. Here, we focus on argumenta...
Bipolar argumentation frameworks enable to rep-resent two kinds of interaction between argu-ments: s...
Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (BAF) are a natural extension of Dung’s Argumentation Frameworks (A...
This paper presents a formal approach to explaining change of inference in Quantitative Bipolar Argu...
Dung's original argumentation frameworks have been extended in various ways. One such extension intr...
Bipolar argument graphs represent the structure of complex pro and contra arguments for one or more ...
Abstract. The identification of consistent sets of arguments is one of the most im-portant concerns ...
International audienceIn the context of bipolar argumentation (argumentation with two kinds of inter...
Arguably the significance of an abstract model of argumentation depends on the range of realistic in...
International audienceGradual semantics are now well-studied in the computational argumentation lite...