We respond to Ron Weber’s commentaries regarding the necessity of a theoretical core in achieving academic legitimacy for the IS field. We examine the practical problems in identifying a theoretical core, clarify the ontological connection between identity and legitimacy, acknowledge mistakes in our earlier formulation criticizing the necessity of theory in legitimation, and attempt a synthesis between our views and those of Weber. The paper concludes with suggestions for improving the workability of efforts to improve the legitimacy of the IS field
Motivated by the continuing anxiety discourse within the IS field and the continuing disrespect IS r...
Power, rule, and legitimacy have always been core concerns of political science. However, as Suchman...
Information Systems scholars continuously debate about the nature of the IS discipline. Recently a s...
We respond to Ron Weber’s commentaries regarding the necessity of a theoretical core in achieving ac...
We respond to Ron Weber’s commentaries regarding the necessity of a theoretical core in achieving ac...
Papers published about the need for a theoretical core in the information systems (IS) discipline ca...
Prompted by the concerns about legitimacy that Josh Reeves expresses in his book Against Methodology...
The short history of Information Systems suggests persistent anxiety about the field’s purported lac...
In this commentary, I respond to Benbasat and Zmud¡¯s (2003) call for a new identity for the IS fiel...
The goal of this paper is identify the theoretical foundations – the core theories – of the IS field...
In this chapter, I review the literature on sociological, political, and administrative legitimacy. ...
We are concerned that the IS research community is making the discipline’s central identity ambi-guo...
<p>Legitimacy, a classic question in political science and sociology for centuries, has recent...
The short history of Information Systems suggests persistent anxiety about the field’s purported lac...
Researchers have emphasized theory’s pivotal importance in the information systems (IS) discipline s...
Motivated by the continuing anxiety discourse within the IS field and the continuing disrespect IS r...
Power, rule, and legitimacy have always been core concerns of political science. However, as Suchman...
Information Systems scholars continuously debate about the nature of the IS discipline. Recently a s...
We respond to Ron Weber’s commentaries regarding the necessity of a theoretical core in achieving ac...
We respond to Ron Weber’s commentaries regarding the necessity of a theoretical core in achieving ac...
Papers published about the need for a theoretical core in the information systems (IS) discipline ca...
Prompted by the concerns about legitimacy that Josh Reeves expresses in his book Against Methodology...
The short history of Information Systems suggests persistent anxiety about the field’s purported lac...
In this commentary, I respond to Benbasat and Zmud¡¯s (2003) call for a new identity for the IS fiel...
The goal of this paper is identify the theoretical foundations – the core theories – of the IS field...
In this chapter, I review the literature on sociological, political, and administrative legitimacy. ...
We are concerned that the IS research community is making the discipline’s central identity ambi-guo...
<p>Legitimacy, a classic question in political science and sociology for centuries, has recent...
The short history of Information Systems suggests persistent anxiety about the field’s purported lac...
Researchers have emphasized theory’s pivotal importance in the information systems (IS) discipline s...
Motivated by the continuing anxiety discourse within the IS field and the continuing disrespect IS r...
Power, rule, and legitimacy have always been core concerns of political science. However, as Suchman...
Information Systems scholars continuously debate about the nature of the IS discipline. Recently a s...