Abstract. Formal axiomatic method popularized by Hilbert and recently defended by Hintikka (in its semantic version) is not fully adequate to the recent practice of axiom-atizing mathematical theories. The axiomatic architecture of (elementary) Topos theory and Homotopy type theory do not fit the pattern of formal axiomatic theory in the stan-dard sense of the word. However these theories fall under a more traditional and more general notion of axiomatic theory, which Hilbert calls constructive. A modern version of constructive axiomatic method can be more suitable for building physical and some other scientific theories than the standard formal axiomatic method. 1
This paper highlights an evident inherent inconsistency or arbitrariness in the axiomatic method in ...
This essay describes an approach to constructive mathematics based on abstract i.e. axiomatic mathem...
Hilbert's axiomatic approach was an optimistic take over on the side of the logical foundations. ...
Abstract. The formal axiomatic method popularized by Hilbert and recently defended by Hintikka is no...
The formal axiomatic method popularized by Hilbert and recently defended by Hintikka is not fully ad...
Abstract. The persisting gap between the formal and the informal mathematics is due to an inadequate...
Philosophical analysis of axiomatic methods goes back at least to Aristotle. In the large literature...
I elaborate in some detail on the First Book of Euclid's ``Elements'' and show that Euclid's theory...
This paper considers the nature and role of axioms from the point of view of the current debates abo...
Abstract: In this article we analyze the key concept of Hilbert's axiomatic method, namely that of a...
International audienceA possible relevant meaning of Hilbert's program is the following one: ``give ...
Lawvere's axiomatization of topos theory and Voevodsky's axiomatization of heigher homotopy theory ...
The article covers one of the formalization forms - axiomatization - and its role in the process of ...
AbstractA possible relevant meaning of Hilbert’s program is the following one: “give a constructive ...
This is a survey of formal axiomatic systems for the three main varieties of constructive analysis, ...
This paper highlights an evident inherent inconsistency or arbitrariness in the axiomatic method in ...
This essay describes an approach to constructive mathematics based on abstract i.e. axiomatic mathem...
Hilbert's axiomatic approach was an optimistic take over on the side of the logical foundations. ...
Abstract. The formal axiomatic method popularized by Hilbert and recently defended by Hintikka is no...
The formal axiomatic method popularized by Hilbert and recently defended by Hintikka is not fully ad...
Abstract. The persisting gap between the formal and the informal mathematics is due to an inadequate...
Philosophical analysis of axiomatic methods goes back at least to Aristotle. In the large literature...
I elaborate in some detail on the First Book of Euclid's ``Elements'' and show that Euclid's theory...
This paper considers the nature and role of axioms from the point of view of the current debates abo...
Abstract: In this article we analyze the key concept of Hilbert's axiomatic method, namely that of a...
International audienceA possible relevant meaning of Hilbert's program is the following one: ``give ...
Lawvere's axiomatization of topos theory and Voevodsky's axiomatization of heigher homotopy theory ...
The article covers one of the formalization forms - axiomatization - and its role in the process of ...
AbstractA possible relevant meaning of Hilbert’s program is the following one: “give a constructive ...
This is a survey of formal axiomatic systems for the three main varieties of constructive analysis, ...
This paper highlights an evident inherent inconsistency or arbitrariness in the axiomatic method in ...
This essay describes an approach to constructive mathematics based on abstract i.e. axiomatic mathem...
Hilbert's axiomatic approach was an optimistic take over on the side of the logical foundations. ...