Abstract. This paper shows how action theory in the language B can be naturally encoded using prioritized default theory. We also show how prioritized default theory can be extended to express preferences between rules and formulae. This extension provides a natural framework to introduce preferences over trajectories in B. We illustrate how these preferences can be expressed and how they can be represented within extended prioritized default theory. We also discuss how this framework can be implemented in terms of answer set programming.
In recent years considerable effort has gone into understanding default reasoning Most of this effor...
We present a framework for reasoning about actions that not only solves the frame and ramification p...
Abstract. We consider the problem of how a default rule can be deduced from a default theory. For th...
In a recent paper [2], Baumann et al. provided a comprehensive framework for default reasoning in ac...
Action languages allow for a concise representation of actions and their effects while at the same t...
Abstract. Action languages allow for a concise representation of ac-tions and their effects while at...
We extend a recent approach to integrate action formalisms and non-monotonic reasoning. The resultin...
Action Theories are versatile and well-studied knowledge representation formalisms for modelling dyn...
In this paper, we present two results on combining approximate and default reasoning. First, we inve...
AbstractWe address the problem of representing common sense knowledge about action domains in the fo...
Default reasoning is reasoning with generalised knowledge which we want to use if there is no more s...
AbstractIn this paper, we address the issue of how Gelfond and Lifschitz's answer set semantics for ...
. In this paper, we address the issue of how Gelfond and Lifschitz's answer set semantics for e...
We consider the problem of incorporating arbi-trary preferences in planning systems. A pref-erence m...
Most of the work in default logic is about default theories that are completely specified. In this c...
In recent years considerable effort has gone into understanding default reasoning Most of this effor...
We present a framework for reasoning about actions that not only solves the frame and ramification p...
Abstract. We consider the problem of how a default rule can be deduced from a default theory. For th...
In a recent paper [2], Baumann et al. provided a comprehensive framework for default reasoning in ac...
Action languages allow for a concise representation of actions and their effects while at the same t...
Abstract. Action languages allow for a concise representation of ac-tions and their effects while at...
We extend a recent approach to integrate action formalisms and non-monotonic reasoning. The resultin...
Action Theories are versatile and well-studied knowledge representation formalisms for modelling dyn...
In this paper, we present two results on combining approximate and default reasoning. First, we inve...
AbstractWe address the problem of representing common sense knowledge about action domains in the fo...
Default reasoning is reasoning with generalised knowledge which we want to use if there is no more s...
AbstractIn this paper, we address the issue of how Gelfond and Lifschitz's answer set semantics for ...
. In this paper, we address the issue of how Gelfond and Lifschitz's answer set semantics for e...
We consider the problem of incorporating arbi-trary preferences in planning systems. A pref-erence m...
Most of the work in default logic is about default theories that are completely specified. In this c...
In recent years considerable effort has gone into understanding default reasoning Most of this effor...
We present a framework for reasoning about actions that not only solves the frame and ramification p...
Abstract. We consider the problem of how a default rule can be deduced from a default theory. For th...