The Reunification of Theology and Comparison in the New Comparative Theology

This paper examines the relationship between the new comparative theology and the theology of religions in light of their common geneal-ogy in the comparative theology of the late nineteenth century. Noting that the latter’s blindness to its considerable biases was sustained by its oppositional relationship with the exclusionary apologetic theology of the day, the paper argues that the new comparative theology risks repeating the same pattern of self-deception when it dichotomizes its relationship with the theology of religions. At the same time, however, the new comparative theology, by openly acknowledging its theological commitments, strips the comparative method of the aura of “science” which has often functioned ideologically to mask bias. In this way, the new comparative theology exemplifies the recent shift in the under-standing of comparison from a method of discovery to a critical method for the testing and revision of the categories through which scholars interpret their data. ONE OF THE UNFORTUNATE consequences of the disciplinary sep-aration between theology and religious studies is that each of these dis-ciplines has tended to ignore developments in the other that would challenge its core presuppositions and clarify its proper task. Many of those who write on the method and theory in the study of religion, fo