For many years, most states have had strategies to support and improve low-performing schools. The recent passage of the 2001 Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA 2001) provides states with an additional opportunity to ensure all schools perform at least at a proficient level. The revised ESEA contains two main components that directly affect low-performing schools. The first component is that states must adopt a single statewide system to show that all students are making adequate yearly progress (AYP) within 12 years. The second component applies a series of intervention to schools that fail to demonstrate AYP over time. This policy brief provides a general description of ESEA's requirements involving AYP and required school ...
This issue brief covers only Parts A and E of ESEA Title I. Part A of Title I, grants to LEAs, const...
are continuing to find new ways to calculate adequate yearly progress (AYP) under the No Child Left ...
make “adequate yearly progress ” towards state benchmarks for three consecutive years are required t...
Bills passed by the U. S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate in spring 2001 to reauthorize...
Over the last three decades, State Education Agencies and State legislatures have taken more active ...
Over the last few decades, state legislative and executive branches, as well as state departments of...
Mintrop examines the degree to which California’s systems of public school accountability and state ...
Based on discussions at a March 2009 symposium, offers policy guidance on turnaround strategies that...
AYP is the key measure in determining whether a public school or school district is making "annual p...
State accountability systems and the No Child Left Behind Act force policymakers and the public, ali...
A letter report issued by the General Accounting Office with an abstract that begins "Concerned that...
Over the last two decades, state and federal laws and grant programs, such as state accountability p...
Over the last two decades, state and federal laws and grant programs, such as state accountability p...
Over the last two decades, state and federal laws and grant programs, such as state accountability p...
When Congress reauthorizes the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), much of the de...
This issue brief covers only Parts A and E of ESEA Title I. Part A of Title I, grants to LEAs, const...
are continuing to find new ways to calculate adequate yearly progress (AYP) under the No Child Left ...
make “adequate yearly progress ” towards state benchmarks for three consecutive years are required t...
Bills passed by the U. S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate in spring 2001 to reauthorize...
Over the last three decades, State Education Agencies and State legislatures have taken more active ...
Over the last few decades, state legislative and executive branches, as well as state departments of...
Mintrop examines the degree to which California’s systems of public school accountability and state ...
Based on discussions at a March 2009 symposium, offers policy guidance on turnaround strategies that...
AYP is the key measure in determining whether a public school or school district is making "annual p...
State accountability systems and the No Child Left Behind Act force policymakers and the public, ali...
A letter report issued by the General Accounting Office with an abstract that begins "Concerned that...
Over the last two decades, state and federal laws and grant programs, such as state accountability p...
Over the last two decades, state and federal laws and grant programs, such as state accountability p...
Over the last two decades, state and federal laws and grant programs, such as state accountability p...
When Congress reauthorizes the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), much of the de...
This issue brief covers only Parts A and E of ESEA Title I. Part A of Title I, grants to LEAs, const...
are continuing to find new ways to calculate adequate yearly progress (AYP) under the No Child Left ...
make “adequate yearly progress ” towards state benchmarks for three consecutive years are required t...