Four theorems on the psychometric function

In a 2-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) discrimination task, observers choose which of two stimuli has the higher value. The psychometric function for this task gives the probability of a correct response for a given stimulus difference, Dx. This paper proves four theorems about the psychometric function. Assuming the observer applies a transducer and adds noise, Theorem 1 derives a convenient general expression for the psychometric function. Discrimination data are often fitted with a Weibull function. Theorem 2 proves that the Weibull ‘‘slope’ ’ parameter, b, can be approximated by bNoise|bTransducer, where bNoise is the b of the Weibull function that fits best to the cumulative noise distribution, and bTransducer depends on the transducer. We derive general expressions for bNoise and bTransducer, from which we derive expressions for specific cases. One case that follows naturally from our general analysis is Pelli’s finding that, when d ’!(Dx)b, b&bNoise|b. We also consider two limiting cases. Theorem 3 proves that, as sensitivity improves, 2AFC performance will usually approach that for a linear transducer, whatever the actual transducer; we show that this does not apply at signal levels where the transducer gradient is zero, which explains why it does not apply to contrast detection. Theorem 4 proves that, when the exponent of a power-function transducer approaches zero, 2AFC performance approaches that of a logarithmic transducer. We show that the power-function exponents of 0.4–0.5 fitted to suprathreshold contrast discrimination data are close enough to zero for the fitted psychometric function to be practically indistinguishable from that of a log transducer. Finally, Weibull b reflect