include an evaluation of the methodological quality of the individual studies that have been included, and are usually conducted by at least 2 individuals. The objective of this study was to assess the methodolog-ical quality and reliability of a series of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of both pharmacological and nonpharmacological interven-tions by use of the 10-item Physiotherapy Evidence-Based Database (PEDro) Scale. Methods. Two abstractors independently reviewed 81 RCTs assessing a variety of interventions. The Cohen kappa statistic and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to assess agreement between abstractors. Results. The average total PEDro scores were 5.94 (SD1.43) for all studies combined, 6.88 (SD1.2) fo...
Background. Numerous tools and individual items have been proposed to assess the methodological qual...
Objectives: The reporting of sampling methods in Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) allows for resear...
Abstract Background The AGREE instrument has been val...
Evidence-based practice involves the use of evidence from systematic reviews and randomised controll...
BACKGROUND There is agreement that the methodological quality of randomized trials should be asse...
BACKGROUND There is agreement that the methodological quality of randomized trials should be asse...
BACKGROUND There is agreement that the methodological quality of randomized trials should be asse...
Evidence-based practice involves the use of evidence from systematic reviews and randomised controll...
There is debate on how the methodological quality of clinical trials should be assessed. We compared...
There is debate on how the methodological quality of clinical trials should be assessed. We compared...
OBJECTIVE There is debate on how the methodological quality of clinical trials should be assessed...
Rationale and aims 'OTseeker' is an online database of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and syste...
Purpose: The quality of reports of randomized trials of physiotherapy interventions varies by year o...
Background and Objectives: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered as the gold standard e...
Background. Numerous tools and individual items have been proposed to assess the methodological qual...
Background. Numerous tools and individual items have been proposed to assess the methodological qual...
Objectives: The reporting of sampling methods in Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) allows for resear...
Abstract Background The AGREE instrument has been val...
Evidence-based practice involves the use of evidence from systematic reviews and randomised controll...
BACKGROUND There is agreement that the methodological quality of randomized trials should be asse...
BACKGROUND There is agreement that the methodological quality of randomized trials should be asse...
BACKGROUND There is agreement that the methodological quality of randomized trials should be asse...
Evidence-based practice involves the use of evidence from systematic reviews and randomised controll...
There is debate on how the methodological quality of clinical trials should be assessed. We compared...
There is debate on how the methodological quality of clinical trials should be assessed. We compared...
OBJECTIVE There is debate on how the methodological quality of clinical trials should be assessed...
Rationale and aims 'OTseeker' is an online database of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and syste...
Purpose: The quality of reports of randomized trials of physiotherapy interventions varies by year o...
Background and Objectives: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered as the gold standard e...
Background. Numerous tools and individual items have been proposed to assess the methodological qual...
Background. Numerous tools and individual items have been proposed to assess the methodological qual...
Objectives: The reporting of sampling methods in Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) allows for resear...
Abstract Background The AGREE instrument has been val...