colleagues for their interest in our recent meta-analysis describing the limitations of healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) as a tool to identify patients at risk of antibiotic-resistant pathogens [1]. Salvatore et al have made a number of criticisms with respect to the search strat-egy, the statistics, and our conclusions [2], and we appreciate the opportunity to respond. First, with regard to their comments on the search strategy, theyare concerned that we did not include several studies, but the studies they cite were all published in mid- to late 2013 after our manuscrip
he concept of healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) is based on three crucial notions: 1) a subgrou...
We thank Keynan et al. for their interest in and comments on our work. They make several noteworthy ...
TO THE EDITOR: We read Fine and colleagues ’ article (1) and Cen-tor’s editorial (2) with great inte...
Eckerle [1] for their comments on our meta-analysis and for sharing their local microbiology and out...
Eckerle [1] for their comments on our meta-analysis and for sharing their local microbiology and out...
Dear Editor, We thank the authors for the interest in our recent publication and for their useful co...
Reply to Yamamoto et al TO THE EDITOR—We have read the com-ments of Yamamoto and colleagues about ou...
[1] regarding our article evaluating the performance of the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and CURB-...
Comment on: Rethinking the concepts of community-acquired and health-care-associated pneumonia. [Lan...
by Fabio and Carrabba [1] regarding our article evaluating the performance of the Pneumonia Severity...
Introduction. The 2005 ATS/IDSA guidelines introduced a concept of "healthcare-associated pneumonia"...
TO THE EDITOR: I read with interest the recent article by Wachter and colleagues (1). An additional ...
To the Editor—We appreciate the comments provided by Parta et al re-garding our article [1, 2]. In o...
We read with interest the report of the randomized double-blind controlled trial by Fernández-Serran...
TO THE EDITOR—We thank Worth and colleagues for reflecting on some important points related to our r...
he concept of healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) is based on three crucial notions: 1) a subgrou...
We thank Keynan et al. for their interest in and comments on our work. They make several noteworthy ...
TO THE EDITOR: We read Fine and colleagues ’ article (1) and Cen-tor’s editorial (2) with great inte...
Eckerle [1] for their comments on our meta-analysis and for sharing their local microbiology and out...
Eckerle [1] for their comments on our meta-analysis and for sharing their local microbiology and out...
Dear Editor, We thank the authors for the interest in our recent publication and for their useful co...
Reply to Yamamoto et al TO THE EDITOR—We have read the com-ments of Yamamoto and colleagues about ou...
[1] regarding our article evaluating the performance of the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and CURB-...
Comment on: Rethinking the concepts of community-acquired and health-care-associated pneumonia. [Lan...
by Fabio and Carrabba [1] regarding our article evaluating the performance of the Pneumonia Severity...
Introduction. The 2005 ATS/IDSA guidelines introduced a concept of "healthcare-associated pneumonia"...
TO THE EDITOR: I read with interest the recent article by Wachter and colleagues (1). An additional ...
To the Editor—We appreciate the comments provided by Parta et al re-garding our article [1, 2]. In o...
We read with interest the report of the randomized double-blind controlled trial by Fernández-Serran...
TO THE EDITOR—We thank Worth and colleagues for reflecting on some important points related to our r...
he concept of healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) is based on three crucial notions: 1) a subgrou...
We thank Keynan et al. for their interest in and comments on our work. They make several noteworthy ...
TO THE EDITOR: We read Fine and colleagues ’ article (1) and Cen-tor’s editorial (2) with great inte...