Thoughts on Critical Histories of International Law

How to write (international) legal histories that would be true to their protagonists while simulta-neously relevant to present audiences? Most of us would also want to write »critically « – that is to say, at least by aiming to avoid Eurocentrism, hagiog-raphy and commitment to an altogether old-fash-ioned view of international law as an instrument of progress. Hence we write today our histories »in context«. But this cannot be all. Framing the relevant »context « is only possible by drawing upon more or less conscious jurisprudential and political preferences. Should attention be focused on academic debates, military power, class struc-tures or assumptions about the longue durée? Such choices determine for us what we think of as relevant »contexts«, and engage us as participants in large conversations about law and power that are not only about what once »was « but also what there will be in the future