Telling it in time: Interpreting consistency and change in the life stories of Holocaust survivors

In this article, I inquire into the life of a single Holocaust survivor in order to give a “thick description ” of the dynamics of talking about the past over time. David K., born in 1928 in Gheorgheni Hungary, was deported to Auschwitz in 1944, where he spent one month before entering slave labor camps in Mühldorf and Mittergars. My reading of David’s life is based upon two interviews, the first from 1982 (at age 54) and the second from 1995 (at age 67). I employ a method of structural interpretation, “narrative mapping,” which is based upon the work of Labov and Waletzky (1967), in order to visualize the amount of overall consistency between the two interviews. I also carefully study individual narratives that are repeated over time. My reading of David’s interviews suggests strong consistency along with sig-nificant changes. There is enormous consistency in the structure and content of narratives but differences in the point or evaluations of narratives. I also argue that David’s later interview is more fully developed; David’s later interview contains several new narratives and integrates historical insights into his account of the past. I discuss the merits of two explanations for this change, culture and time in development. Finally, I suggest possible strategies for researchers interested in working with the vast archives of survivor interviews. As we move past the fiftieth anniversary of the liberation of Europe from the Nazis and on toward the sixtieth year, the number of survivors of the death and concentration camps still alive is rapidly declining; those who are still able to describe their life experiences from that period of time are now in old age. In the 18