This paper tests traditional capital structure models against the alternative of a pecking order model of corporate financing. The basic pecking order model, which predicts external debt financing driven by the internal financial deficit, has much greater explanatory power than a static trade-off model which predicts that each firm adjusts toward an optimal debt ratio. We show that the power of some usual tests of the trade-off model is virtually nil. We question whether the available empirical evidence supports the notion of an optimal debt ratio. Testing Static Trade-off against Pecking Order Models of Capita
The purpose of this study is to revisit the capital structure theory and compares the explanatory po...
This paper tested the two competing capital structure theories, namely the Pecking order theory and ...
This master thesis concerns whether Swedish non-financial listed firms act in accordance with the op...
The static tradeoff theory of capital structure predicts that firms aim to approach a target debt ra...
The static tradeoff theory of capital structure predicts that firms aim to approach a target debt ra...
This paper tests the static tradeoff theory against the pecking order theory. We focus on an importa...
This paper tests the static tradeoff theory against the pecking order theory. We focus on an importa...
Most academic insights about corporate capital structure decisions come from models that focus on th...
We examine the impact of explicitly incorporating a measure of debt capacity in recent tests of comp...
In 1984, Stewart Myers proposed his Pecking Order Theory, which states that the firm has no well-def...
This thesis aims to explain the choice of capital structure in the times of crisis (2007-2009) for t...
In this paper we have used the Compustat data-set covering 1983-2003 to test empirically whether a f...
This paper aims at testing the static tradeoff theory and the pecking order theory against British c...
The Static Tradeoff and Pecking Order theories are tested on a sample data of 35 services firms unde...
Pecking order theory is frequently compared with the Trade-off, Market timing, and Agency theories. ...
The purpose of this study is to revisit the capital structure theory and compares the explanatory po...
This paper tested the two competing capital structure theories, namely the Pecking order theory and ...
This master thesis concerns whether Swedish non-financial listed firms act in accordance with the op...
The static tradeoff theory of capital structure predicts that firms aim to approach a target debt ra...
The static tradeoff theory of capital structure predicts that firms aim to approach a target debt ra...
This paper tests the static tradeoff theory against the pecking order theory. We focus on an importa...
This paper tests the static tradeoff theory against the pecking order theory. We focus on an importa...
Most academic insights about corporate capital structure decisions come from models that focus on th...
We examine the impact of explicitly incorporating a measure of debt capacity in recent tests of comp...
In 1984, Stewart Myers proposed his Pecking Order Theory, which states that the firm has no well-def...
This thesis aims to explain the choice of capital structure in the times of crisis (2007-2009) for t...
In this paper we have used the Compustat data-set covering 1983-2003 to test empirically whether a f...
This paper aims at testing the static tradeoff theory and the pecking order theory against British c...
The Static Tradeoff and Pecking Order theories are tested on a sample data of 35 services firms unde...
Pecking order theory is frequently compared with the Trade-off, Market timing, and Agency theories. ...
The purpose of this study is to revisit the capital structure theory and compares the explanatory po...
This paper tested the two competing capital structure theories, namely the Pecking order theory and ...
This master thesis concerns whether Swedish non-financial listed firms act in accordance with the op...