Add to ORKGABSTRACT: The quality of argumentation in parliamentary debates may play an important role in the evaluation of legislative decisions. In this contribution I will discuss shortcomings in the application of the pragma-dialectical argumentation theory for the analysis and evaluation of the argumentation in a parliamentary debate on the penalization of stalking. The case illustrates that institutional preconditions of a specific type of debate should be taken into account in order to be able to give an adequate analysis of these debates
This chapter analyzes the parliamentary debate on university tuition fees that took place in Decembe...
The aim of this paper is to describe the way in which argumentative patterns come into being in plen...
This chapter explores the theoretical mechanisms underpinning the participation of Members of Parlia...
The quality of argumentation in parliamentary debates may play an important role in the evaluation o...
The quality of argumentation in parliamentary debates may play an important role in the evaluation o...
Having accurate information about the arguments presented for and against a legislative proposal in ...
In order to be able to evaluate argumentation supporting judicial decisions, certain norms of reason...
The paper outlines some institutional characteristics of Second Reading debates on public bills in t...
In this paper, close attention is paid to the argumentative patterns resulting from combining pragma...
This paper focuses on argumentation in a specific institutional context: debate in the European Parl...
This paper focuses on argumentation the institutional context of debate in the European Parliament. ...
To illustrate the development of argumentation theory, the paper traces the journey of the pragma-di...
Examples or exemplary cases may perform an important role in parliamentary debates. Members of Parli...
This thesis critically reviews the pragma-dialectical approach to the study of argumentationadvanced...
This contribution discusses some problems of Pragma-Dialectics and explains them by its consensualis...
This chapter analyzes the parliamentary debate on university tuition fees that took place in Decembe...
The aim of this paper is to describe the way in which argumentative patterns come into being in plen...
This chapter explores the theoretical mechanisms underpinning the participation of Members of Parlia...
The quality of argumentation in parliamentary debates may play an important role in the evaluation o...
The quality of argumentation in parliamentary debates may play an important role in the evaluation o...
Having accurate information about the arguments presented for and against a legislative proposal in ...
In order to be able to evaluate argumentation supporting judicial decisions, certain norms of reason...
The paper outlines some institutional characteristics of Second Reading debates on public bills in t...
In this paper, close attention is paid to the argumentative patterns resulting from combining pragma...
This paper focuses on argumentation in a specific institutional context: debate in the European Parl...
This paper focuses on argumentation the institutional context of debate in the European Parliament. ...
To illustrate the development of argumentation theory, the paper traces the journey of the pragma-di...
Examples or exemplary cases may perform an important role in parliamentary debates. Members of Parli...
This thesis critically reviews the pragma-dialectical approach to the study of argumentationadvanced...
This contribution discusses some problems of Pragma-Dialectics and explains them by its consensualis...
This chapter analyzes the parliamentary debate on university tuition fees that took place in Decembe...
The aim of this paper is to describe the way in which argumentative patterns come into being in plen...
This chapter explores the theoretical mechanisms underpinning the participation of Members of Parlia...