The integration of learning paradigms by way of a non-causal analysis of behavioral events1

The main purpose of this paper is to show that all types of psychological interactions may be understood as matters of substitution of functions or function transfer. On the basis of this analysis, we argue that the distinction between Pavlovian and operant conditioning, as different types of learning processes, may be unnecessary. To do so we critically analyze the rationale for characterizing operant and classical conditioning as two types of learning processes, examine the similarities and differences between types of psychological events and identify which properties of substitution are particular to each type. We present the notion of function transfer as the main underlying process that accounts for all psychological interactions. Key words: pavlovian conditioning, reinforcement, S-S relations, stimulus equivalence, function transfer, human causal learning, complex human behavior Resumen El propósito fundamental de este artículo es mostrar que todos los tipos de interacciones psicológicas pueden ser entendidas en términos de sustitución o transferencia de funciones. A partir de este análisis planteamos que la distinción entre condicionamiento Pavloviano y operante como tipos diferentes d