Add to ORKGBackground: The QUOROM and PRISMA statements were published in 1999 and 2009, respectively, to improve the consistency of reporting systematic reviews (SRs)/meta-analyses (MAs) of clinical trials. However, not all SRs/MAs adhere completely to these important standards. In particular, it is not clear how well SRs/MAs of acupuncture studies adhere to reporting standards and which reporting criteria are generally ignored in these analyses. Objectives: To evaluate reporting quality in SRs/MAs of acupuncture studies. Methods:We performed a literature search for studies published prior to 2014 using the following public archives: PubMed
The present study describes the development of a comprehensive quality of reporting assessment tool ...
Abstract Background Reporting quality of systematic reviews’ (SRs) abstracts is important because th...
Abstract Background This study was designed to assess the quality of reporting on randomized control...
The QUOROM and PRISMA statements were published in 1999 and 2009, respectively, to improve the consi...
The QUOROM and PRISMA statements were published in 1999 and 2009, respectively, to improve the consi...
Abstract Background While well-conducted systematic reviews (SRs) can provide the best evidence on t...
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the completeness of reporting of RCTs of acupuncture in the K...
BACKGROUND: We investigated whether there had been an improvement in quality of reporting for random...
BACKGROUND: Acupuncture is widely used worldwide, and systematic reviews on acupuncture are increasi...
The quality of reporting in systematic reviews (SRs)/meta-analyses (MAs) of diagnostic tests publish...
We investigated whether there had been an improvement in quality of reporting for randomised control...
Background: Systematic reviews (SRs) and/or meta-analyses of in vitro research have an important rol...
Guidelines for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews (SRs) were devel...
To assess the reporting quality of acupuncture trials for knee osteoarthritis (KOA), and explore the...
Systematic reviews (SRs) of TCM have become increasingly popular in China and have been published in...
The present study describes the development of a comprehensive quality of reporting assessment tool ...
Abstract Background Reporting quality of systematic reviews’ (SRs) abstracts is important because th...
Abstract Background This study was designed to assess the quality of reporting on randomized control...
The QUOROM and PRISMA statements were published in 1999 and 2009, respectively, to improve the consi...
The QUOROM and PRISMA statements were published in 1999 and 2009, respectively, to improve the consi...
Abstract Background While well-conducted systematic reviews (SRs) can provide the best evidence on t...
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the completeness of reporting of RCTs of acupuncture in the K...
BACKGROUND: We investigated whether there had been an improvement in quality of reporting for random...
BACKGROUND: Acupuncture is widely used worldwide, and systematic reviews on acupuncture are increasi...
The quality of reporting in systematic reviews (SRs)/meta-analyses (MAs) of diagnostic tests publish...
We investigated whether there had been an improvement in quality of reporting for randomised control...
Background: Systematic reviews (SRs) and/or meta-analyses of in vitro research have an important rol...
Guidelines for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews (SRs) were devel...
To assess the reporting quality of acupuncture trials for knee osteoarthritis (KOA), and explore the...
Systematic reviews (SRs) of TCM have become increasingly popular in China and have been published in...
The present study describes the development of a comprehensive quality of reporting assessment tool ...
Abstract Background Reporting quality of systematic reviews’ (SRs) abstracts is important because th...
Abstract Background This study was designed to assess the quality of reporting on randomized control...