RESEARCH ARTICLE Relative Importance of Aortic Stiffness and Volume as Predictors of Treatment-Induced Improvement in Left Ventricular Mass Index in Dialysis

This study aimed to explore the relative contribution of aortic stiffness and volume in treat-ment-induced change of left ventricular mass in dialysis. Hypertension in Hemodialysis Patients Treated with Atenolol or Lisinopril trial compared the effect of lisinopril versus aten-olol in reducing left ventricular mass index; 179 patients with echo measurements of aortic pulse wave velocity and left ventricular mass at baseline were included. In unadjusted anal-ysis, overall reductions of 26.24 g/m2 (95 % CI:-49.20,-3.29) and 35.67 g/m2 (95 % CI:-63.70,-7.64) in left ventricular mass index were noted from baseline to 6 and 12 months respectively. Volume control emerged as an important determinant of regression of left ven-tricular mass index due to the following reasons: (i) additional control for change in ambula-tory systolic blood pressure mitigated the reduction in left ventricular mass index in the statistical model above [6-month visit:-18.6 g/m2 (95 % CI:-43.7, 6.5); 12-month visit:-22.1 g/m2 (95 % CI:-52.2, 8.0)] (ii) regression of left ventricular hypertrophy was primarily due to reduction in left ventricular chamber and not wall thickness and (iii) adjustment for inferior vena cava diameter (as a proxy for volume) removed the effect of time on left ventricular mass index reduction [6-month visit:-6.6 g/m2 (95 % CI: (-41.6, 28.4); 12-month visit: 0.6 g/ m2 (95 % CI:-39.5, 40.7)]. In contrast, aortic pulse wave velocity was neither a determinant of baseline left ventricular mass index nor predictor of its reduction. Among dialysis patients, ambulatory systolic pressure, a proxy for volume expansion, but not aortic stiffness is more important predictor of reduction in left ventricular mass index. Improving blood pressure control via adequate volume management appears as an effective strategy to improve left ventricular hypertrophy in dialysis