Misconceptions and ill-founded theories can arise in all areas of science. However, the apparent accessibility of many epidemiology findings and popular interest in the subject can lead to additional misunderstandings. The article below is the fifth in an occasional series of short editorials highlighting some current misinterpretations of epidemiological findings. Invited authors will be given wide scope in judging the prevalence of the misconception under discussion. We hope that this series will prove instructive to cancer researchers in other disciplines as well as to students of epidemiology
The commentary by Boffetta et al. ( 1) repeats many familiar warnings about reporting false-positive...
Cancer research in the news is often associated with sensationalised and inaccurate reporting, which...
scientific evidence that can ultimately form the basis of strategies for improving population health...
Misconceptions and ill-founded theories can arise in all areas of science. However, the apparent acc...
To the clinical specialists, epidemiology appears to be a hyphenated word associated with their clin...
The making of an epidemiological theory of bias and confounding We have chosen to discuss the histor...
Misconceptions and ill-founded theories can arise in all areas of science. However, the apparent acc...
False-positive results are inherent in the scientific process of testing hypotheses concerning the d...
Epidemiology has seen many theoretical advances over the past 20 years. Since the advances of one pe...
"The causes of cancer ' was an epidemological review, written for the benefit of the US Co...
Background Research involving the discovery of novel anticancer drugs and treatments hold precedence...
Bias and confounding are the twin banes of epidemiology,but of the 2, bias is worse. Confounding can...
This article describes contrasting ideas for a set of topics in epidemiological thinking. The premi...
BACKGROUND: As an observational science, epidemiology is regarded by some researchers as inherently ...
Background:Cancer epidemiologyhas been criticized for producing false-positive associations. The pre...
The commentary by Boffetta et al. ( 1) repeats many familiar warnings about reporting false-positive...
Cancer research in the news is often associated with sensationalised and inaccurate reporting, which...
scientific evidence that can ultimately form the basis of strategies for improving population health...
Misconceptions and ill-founded theories can arise in all areas of science. However, the apparent acc...
To the clinical specialists, epidemiology appears to be a hyphenated word associated with their clin...
The making of an epidemiological theory of bias and confounding We have chosen to discuss the histor...
Misconceptions and ill-founded theories can arise in all areas of science. However, the apparent acc...
False-positive results are inherent in the scientific process of testing hypotheses concerning the d...
Epidemiology has seen many theoretical advances over the past 20 years. Since the advances of one pe...
"The causes of cancer ' was an epidemological review, written for the benefit of the US Co...
Background Research involving the discovery of novel anticancer drugs and treatments hold precedence...
Bias and confounding are the twin banes of epidemiology,but of the 2, bias is worse. Confounding can...
This article describes contrasting ideas for a set of topics in epidemiological thinking. The premi...
BACKGROUND: As an observational science, epidemiology is regarded by some researchers as inherently ...
Background:Cancer epidemiologyhas been criticized for producing false-positive associations. The pre...
The commentary by Boffetta et al. ( 1) repeats many familiar warnings about reporting false-positive...
Cancer research in the news is often associated with sensationalised and inaccurate reporting, which...
scientific evidence that can ultimately form the basis of strategies for improving population health...