Add to ORKGIntroduction: PRISMA statement was published in 2009 in order to set standards in the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of PRISMA endorsement on the quality of reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, published in journals in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology (GH). Methods: Quality of reporting and methodological quality were evaluated by assessing the adherence of papers to PRISMA checklist and AMSTAR quality scale. After identifying the GH journals which endorsed PRISMA in instructions for authors (IA)
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and sa...
Background & Aim: In the view of the importance of evidence-based clinical practice in recent years,...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and sa...
INTRODUCTION: PRISMA statement was published in 2009 in order to set standards in the reporting of s...
PRISMA statement was published in 2009 in order to set standards in the reporting of systematic revi...
INTRODUCTION: PRISMA statement was published in 2009 in order to set standards in the reporting of s...
<div><p>Introduction</p><p>PRISMA statement was published in 2009 in order to set standards in the r...
Background: The PRISMA Statement is a reporting guideline designed to improve transparency of system...
Background: The PRISMA Statement is a reporting guideline designed to improve transparency of system...
Abstract Background The PRISMA Statement is a reporting guideline designed to improve transparency o...
Abstract Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have become increasinglyimportant in health care. Clinicians re...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have become increasinglyimportant in health care. Clinicians re...
Abstract Background Reporting quality of systematic reviews’ (SRs) abstracts is important because th...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and sa...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and sa...
Background & Aim: In the view of the importance of evidence-based clinical practice in recent years,...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and sa...
INTRODUCTION: PRISMA statement was published in 2009 in order to set standards in the reporting of s...
PRISMA statement was published in 2009 in order to set standards in the reporting of systematic revi...
INTRODUCTION: PRISMA statement was published in 2009 in order to set standards in the reporting of s...
<div><p>Introduction</p><p>PRISMA statement was published in 2009 in order to set standards in the r...
Background: The PRISMA Statement is a reporting guideline designed to improve transparency of system...
Background: The PRISMA Statement is a reporting guideline designed to improve transparency of system...
Abstract Background The PRISMA Statement is a reporting guideline designed to improve transparency o...
Abstract Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have become increasinglyimportant in health care. Clinicians re...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have become increasinglyimportant in health care. Clinicians re...
Abstract Background Reporting quality of systematic reviews’ (SRs) abstracts is important because th...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and sa...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and sa...
Background & Aim: In the view of the importance of evidence-based clinical practice in recent years,...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and sa...