Maxillary protraction using skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics in Skeletal Class III patients The aim of this case report is to describe the treatment of a patient with skeletal Class III malocclusion with maxillary retrognathia using skeletal anchorage devices and intermaxillary elastics. Miniplates were inserted between the mandibular lateral incisor and canine teeth on both sides in a male patient aged 14 years 5 months. Self-drilling mini-implants (1.6 mm diameter, 10 mm length) were installed between the maxillary second premolar and molar teeth, and Class III elastics were used between the miniplates and miniscrews. On treatment completion, an increase in the projection of the maxilla relative to the cranial base (2.7 mm) ...
Contains fulltext : 70776.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)Unilateral clo...
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare treatment outcomes with different maxillary protract...
Objective: To analyze the treatment effects of corticotomy-assisted maxillary protraction with skele...
Introduction: Early Class III treatment with reverse-pull headgear generally results in maxillary sk...
Abstract: The correction of a severe maxillary protrusion in an adult by distal movement of the maxi...
Early Class III treatment with reverse-pull headgear generally results in maxillary skeletal protrac...
Early Class III treatment with reverse-pull headgear generally results in maxillary skeletal protrac...
This study evaluated the impact of class III correction by elastic traction on four miniplates and t...
Contains fulltext : 96373.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)OBJECTIVE: To ev...
This report describes the case of a 12-year-old female patient with a long mandible experiencing dif...
Introduction: Dentofacial functional appliances used for the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclu...
Introduction: Skeletal anchorage-supported applications are performed to increase the skeletal effec...
Background/Purpose: Little information related to the treatment effects of the occipitomental anchor...
Objective: To compare two different skeletal anchorage methods with finite element analysis in the t...
Objective: To compare two different skeletal anchorage methods with finite element analysis in the t...
Contains fulltext : 70776.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)Unilateral clo...
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare treatment outcomes with different maxillary protract...
Objective: To analyze the treatment effects of corticotomy-assisted maxillary protraction with skele...
Introduction: Early Class III treatment with reverse-pull headgear generally results in maxillary sk...
Abstract: The correction of a severe maxillary protrusion in an adult by distal movement of the maxi...
Early Class III treatment with reverse-pull headgear generally results in maxillary skeletal protrac...
Early Class III treatment with reverse-pull headgear generally results in maxillary skeletal protrac...
This study evaluated the impact of class III correction by elastic traction on four miniplates and t...
Contains fulltext : 96373.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)OBJECTIVE: To ev...
This report describes the case of a 12-year-old female patient with a long mandible experiencing dif...
Introduction: Dentofacial functional appliances used for the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclu...
Introduction: Skeletal anchorage-supported applications are performed to increase the skeletal effec...
Background/Purpose: Little information related to the treatment effects of the occipitomental anchor...
Objective: To compare two different skeletal anchorage methods with finite element analysis in the t...
Objective: To compare two different skeletal anchorage methods with finite element analysis in the t...
Contains fulltext : 70776.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)Unilateral clo...
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare treatment outcomes with different maxillary protract...
Objective: To analyze the treatment effects of corticotomy-assisted maxillary protraction with skele...