► structured review ► spine surgery ► disk replacement ► lumbar fusions ► adverse events Abstract Study Design Systematic review. Objectives (1) To compare the quality of adverse event (AE) methodology and reporting among randomized trials comparing lumbar fusion with lumbar total disk replacement (TDR) using established AE reporting systems; (2) to compare the AEs and reoperations of lumbar spinal fusion with those from lumbar TDR; (3) to make recommendations on how to report AEs in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) so that surgeons and patients have more-detailed and comprehensive information when making treatment decisions. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, the Cochrane collaboration database, and the National Guideline Clearingho...
OBJECTIVE: To describe outcome measurement instruments and outcome domains in randomised controlled ...
Study design: A retrospective review of Medicare claims data (2009-2014).Objective: The aim of this ...
This is the final version. Available on open access from BMC via the DOI in this recordAvailability ...
► spinal fusion ► evidence-based medicine ► adverse events ► spine surgery Abstract Study Design Sys...
Background: Independent of efficacy, information on safety of surgical procedures is essential for i...
Contains fulltext : 169182.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Lum...
Objective The reported incidence of complications and/or adverse events (AEs) following spine surger...
Objective. Lumbar interventional pain procedures (LIPPs) are frequently used in low back pain and ha...
Background Context: Laminectomy is a common vertebral decompression procedure that has multiple pote...
In the setting of the recent increase in the use of nationwide databases to study rates of adverse e...
Disability secondary to disorders of the spine is a significant problem worldwide. In the USA, there...
Abstract Background Reporting of adverse events in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is encouraged b...
Background: Fusion of lumbar spine segments is a well-established therapy for many pathologies. The ...
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of patients u...
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of guidelines for lumbar spine fusions among spine surgeons in North ...
OBJECTIVE: To describe outcome measurement instruments and outcome domains in randomised controlled ...
Study design: A retrospective review of Medicare claims data (2009-2014).Objective: The aim of this ...
This is the final version. Available on open access from BMC via the DOI in this recordAvailability ...
► spinal fusion ► evidence-based medicine ► adverse events ► spine surgery Abstract Study Design Sys...
Background: Independent of efficacy, information on safety of surgical procedures is essential for i...
Contains fulltext : 169182.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Lum...
Objective The reported incidence of complications and/or adverse events (AEs) following spine surger...
Objective. Lumbar interventional pain procedures (LIPPs) are frequently used in low back pain and ha...
Background Context: Laminectomy is a common vertebral decompression procedure that has multiple pote...
In the setting of the recent increase in the use of nationwide databases to study rates of adverse e...
Disability secondary to disorders of the spine is a significant problem worldwide. In the USA, there...
Abstract Background Reporting of adverse events in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is encouraged b...
Background: Fusion of lumbar spine segments is a well-established therapy for many pathologies. The ...
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of patients u...
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of guidelines for lumbar spine fusions among spine surgeons in North ...
OBJECTIVE: To describe outcome measurement instruments and outcome domains in randomised controlled ...
Study design: A retrospective review of Medicare claims data (2009-2014).Objective: The aim of this ...
This is the final version. Available on open access from BMC via the DOI in this recordAvailability ...