Clinical Study Staging Laparoscopy in Carcinoma of Stomach: A Comparison with CECT Staging

Copyright © 2013 Showkat Majeed Kakroo et al.This is an open access article distributed under the Creative CommonsAttribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in anymedium, provided the originalwork is properly cited. Background. aim of this study was to compare the role of diagnostic laparoscopy and contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of abdomen in the staging of stomach carcinoma. Methods. This was a prospective study conducted in a tertiary care hospital over a period of two years and included 50 patients of endoscopy and biopsy proven stomach carcinoma that were found to be operable on CECT. Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed in all patients before proceeding to a formal laparotomy. Results. Metastasis was detected at diagnostic laparoscopy in 14 (28%) patients. CECT correctly identified the T stage in 22 (61%) patients. Overall accuracy of CECT for T stagingwas 74%with a a sensitivity of 65 % and a specificity of 79%. Laparoscopy correctly identified the T stage in 26 (72%) patients. Overall accuracy of laparoscopy for T staging was 81 % with a sensitivity of 76 % and specificity of 86%. the most common N stage on CECT was N0 (50%). CECT correctly identified the N stage in 26 (72%) patients. Overall accuracy of CECT forN stagingwas 86%with a sensitivity of 50 % and a specificity of 90%. themost commonN stage on laparoscopy was N0 and N2 (42 % each). Laparoscopy correctly identified the N stage in 27 (75%) patients. Overall accuracy of Laparoscopy for N staging was 88 % with a sensitivity of 53 % and specificity of 91%. Conclusion. Laparoscopy is a valuable technique in staging o