Add to ORKGThere are formatting errors in the text of the PDF and in Figure 2 that were introduced while the article was being prepared by production for publication. The journal apologizes for these errors and is including the correct text and figure below. In the second sentence of the fourth paragraph of the Materials and Methods section, there are incorrect line breaks. The correct sentence should read: In 2009 (n = 169 sampling days) and 2010 (n = 164 sampling days), between 100 and 250 kg and 100 and 300 kg of fish, respectively, were each introduced on the first (mean2009 6 SD = 147.3 6 19.2 kg; mean2010 6 SD = 132.1 6 42.8 kg) and second dive of the day (mean2009 6 SD = 170.2 6 29.5 kg; mean2010 6 SD = 140.5 6 49.9 kg). The grey shaded areas i...
The original version of this Article contained an error in the name of the author José P. Granadeiro...
International audienceIn the original version of this Article, the data accession 10.17882/42182 was...
The publisher regrets that fig. 3 is a copy of fig. 4. The correct version of fig. 3 is below: [Figu...
There are two textual errors in the published paper. In the Abstract, the last line reads “hotpots” ...
In the version of this Article originally published, a technical error meant two proof corrections w...
Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47899-7, published online 09 Au...
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper
This page is a correction to an article by Eugene G. Maurakis and David V. Grimes: Predicting Fish S...
This is a correction to: ICES Journal of Marine Science, Volume 72, Issue 1, 1 January 2015, Pages ...
An Amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper
The authors wish to correct a statement in the published paper [1], doi:10.3390/f5112750, website: h...
In the original publication of the article, the Fig. 4 was erroneously published.</p
Table 1 of this article was published across four pages instead of one as it was submitted. For bett...
Due to an unfortunate turn of events, four rows in Table 2 were transposed. Hence, the original arti...
Original article: https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2021/8837 A species name was erroneously reported:Ca...
The original version of this Article contained an error in the name of the author José P. Granadeiro...
International audienceIn the original version of this Article, the data accession 10.17882/42182 was...
The publisher regrets that fig. 3 is a copy of fig. 4. The correct version of fig. 3 is below: [Figu...
There are two textual errors in the published paper. In the Abstract, the last line reads “hotpots” ...
In the version of this Article originally published, a technical error meant two proof corrections w...
Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47899-7, published online 09 Au...
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper
This page is a correction to an article by Eugene G. Maurakis and David V. Grimes: Predicting Fish S...
This is a correction to: ICES Journal of Marine Science, Volume 72, Issue 1, 1 January 2015, Pages ...
An Amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper
The authors wish to correct a statement in the published paper [1], doi:10.3390/f5112750, website: h...
In the original publication of the article, the Fig. 4 was erroneously published.</p
Table 1 of this article was published across four pages instead of one as it was submitted. For bett...
Due to an unfortunate turn of events, four rows in Table 2 were transposed. Hence, the original arti...
Original article: https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2021/8837 A species name was erroneously reported:Ca...
The original version of this Article contained an error in the name of the author José P. Granadeiro...
International audienceIn the original version of this Article, the data accession 10.17882/42182 was...
The publisher regrets that fig. 3 is a copy of fig. 4. The correct version of fig. 3 is below: [Figu...