RESEARCH ARTICLE ‘Bee Hotels ’ as Tools for Native Pollinator Conservation: A Premature Verdict?

Society is increasingly concerned with declining wild bee populations. Although most bees nest in the ground, considerable effort has centered on installing ‘bee hotels’—also known as nest boxes or trap nests—which artificially aggregate nest sites of above ground nesting bees. Campaigns to ‘save the bees ’ often promote these devices despite the absence of data indicating they have a positive effect. From a survey of almost 600 bee hotels set up over a period of three years in Toronto, Canada, introduced bees nested at 32.9 % of sites and represented 24.6 % of more than 27,000 total bees and wasps recorded (47.1 % of all bees recorded). Native bees were parasitized more than introduced bees and females of in-troduced bee species provisioned nests with significantly more female larva each year. Na-tive wasps were significantly more abundant than both native and introduced bees and occupied almost 3/4 of all bee hotels each year; further, introduced wasps were the only group to significantly increase in relative abundance year over year. More research is need-ed to elucidate the potential pitfalls and benefits of using bee hotels in the conservation and population dynamics of wild native bees