Mediated Public Diplomacy A Relative Political and Value Proximity in Mediated Public Diplomacy: The Effect of

This paper applies the homophily thesis to public diplomacy and offers an empirical examination of a country’s success in its mediated public diplomacy efforts. It analyzes international frame building, the process of creating or changing media frames in the international communications arena, by applying it to the case of Israeli mediated public diplomacy efforts during the war in Gaza in the winter of 2008-2009. The paper claims that one way to use the homophily thesis in empirical analyses of international frame building campaigns in conflicts is to measure the political and value proximity of a country promoting frames to other countries. Yet proximity should be measured relatively rather than in absolute terms. Therefore, one should look not only at the dyadic proximity between two actors (i.e., Country A that attempts to promote its frames to Country C), but rather at the relative proximity between Countries A and C considering the proximity between the rival Country B and the target Country C. The study proposes a model and a method to facilitate empirical analysis of this claim. Using sophisticated computerized content analysis, our analyses demonstrated that relative proximity was related to successful international frame building in the hypothesized direction: the closer the relative proximity between Israel and a foreign country, the greater the acceptance of Israel’s views