Add to ORKGBupivacaine 0.5 % versus articaine 4 % for the removal of lower third molars. A crossover randomized controlled tria
Objectives: To compare the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 0.5% bupivacaine and 4% articaine (both w...
Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4 % articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2 % lidocaine with...
Introduction: The substitution of reference drugs for similar, new or existing drugs in the market i...
Objective: To compare the anesthetic action of 0.5% bupivacaine in relation to 4% articaine, both wi...
Objective: This study compared the clinical efficacy of 4% articaine (A200) and 0.5% bupivacaine (B2...
Influence of two different surgical techniques on the difficulty of impacted lower third molar extra...
The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of articaine at 4% (epinephrine 1:100...
The different indications for extraction of the lower third molars, require resources to manage pain...
Objective: Comparison of the clinical efficacy of 4% articaine in relation to 2% mepivacaine, both w...
Comparison of the efficacy of low doses of methylprednisolone, acetaminophen, and dexketoprofen trom...
Objectives: To compare the possible benefits of the combination of dexamethasone–bupivacaine with ar...
Background: A comparative study is made of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocai...
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of bupivacaine and lignocaine for ...
Background: Articaine, commercially available in South Korea from 2004, is widely being used for den...
Effectiveness of 1 % versus 0.2 % chlorhexidine gels in reducing alveolar osteitis from mandibular t...
Objectives: To compare the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 0.5% bupivacaine and 4% articaine (both w...
Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4 % articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2 % lidocaine with...
Introduction: The substitution of reference drugs for similar, new or existing drugs in the market i...
Objective: To compare the anesthetic action of 0.5% bupivacaine in relation to 4% articaine, both wi...
Objective: This study compared the clinical efficacy of 4% articaine (A200) and 0.5% bupivacaine (B2...
Influence of two different surgical techniques on the difficulty of impacted lower third molar extra...
The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of articaine at 4% (epinephrine 1:100...
The different indications for extraction of the lower third molars, require resources to manage pain...
Objective: Comparison of the clinical efficacy of 4% articaine in relation to 2% mepivacaine, both w...
Comparison of the efficacy of low doses of methylprednisolone, acetaminophen, and dexketoprofen trom...
Objectives: To compare the possible benefits of the combination of dexamethasone–bupivacaine with ar...
Background: A comparative study is made of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocai...
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of bupivacaine and lignocaine for ...
Background: Articaine, commercially available in South Korea from 2004, is widely being used for den...
Effectiveness of 1 % versus 0.2 % chlorhexidine gels in reducing alveolar osteitis from mandibular t...
Objectives: To compare the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 0.5% bupivacaine and 4% articaine (both w...
Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4 % articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2 % lidocaine with...
Introduction: The substitution of reference drugs for similar, new or existing drugs in the market i...