Add to ORKGThe review process of academic, scientific research and its basic tenets is considered, thereby distinguishing between (i) reviewing of manuscripts to be published in the scientific literature, (ii) reviewing of research proposals to be financed by funding agencies, (iii) reviewing of educational or research institutions with respect to their proper functioning, and (iv) reviewing of scientists with the aim of appointing or tenuring faculty
In the U.K. definitions of research have been intimately tied up with the notion of ‘peer-review’ de...
Peer review is a critical part of the publishing process at JM3, as it is for most science journals....
researchers are invited to contribute and to submit manuscripts to the editors. All papers are subje...
The review process of academic, scientific research and its basic tenets is considered, thereby dist...
The review process of academic, scientific research and its basic tenets is considered, thereby dist...
Academic journals rely on researchers agreeing to act as reviewers (or referees) for submitted paper...
The selection of referees for evaluation of research projects under competitive financing appears pa...
Academic journals rely on researchers agreeing to act as reviewers (or referees) for submitted paper...
The selection of referees for evaluation of research projects under competitive financing appears pa...
The selection of referees for evaluation of research projects under competitive financing appears pa...
The selection of referees for evaluation of research projects under competitive financing appears pa...
This chapter explains the functioning of scientific journals from the editorial side of the process....
Quality peer reviewing is not only crucial for publications, but it is vital for the career developm...
The referee is the judge, the warrantor, the decider that has to evaluate the scientific article. No...
Quality peer reviewing is not only crucial for publications, but it is vital for the career developm...
In the U.K. definitions of research have been intimately tied up with the notion of ‘peer-review’ de...
Peer review is a critical part of the publishing process at JM3, as it is for most science journals....
researchers are invited to contribute and to submit manuscripts to the editors. All papers are subje...
The review process of academic, scientific research and its basic tenets is considered, thereby dist...
The review process of academic, scientific research and its basic tenets is considered, thereby dist...
Academic journals rely on researchers agreeing to act as reviewers (or referees) for submitted paper...
The selection of referees for evaluation of research projects under competitive financing appears pa...
Academic journals rely on researchers agreeing to act as reviewers (or referees) for submitted paper...
The selection of referees for evaluation of research projects under competitive financing appears pa...
The selection of referees for evaluation of research projects under competitive financing appears pa...
The selection of referees for evaluation of research projects under competitive financing appears pa...
This chapter explains the functioning of scientific journals from the editorial side of the process....
Quality peer reviewing is not only crucial for publications, but it is vital for the career developm...
The referee is the judge, the warrantor, the decider that has to evaluate the scientific article. No...
Quality peer reviewing is not only crucial for publications, but it is vital for the career developm...
In the U.K. definitions of research have been intimately tied up with the notion of ‘peer-review’ de...
Peer review is a critical part of the publishing process at JM3, as it is for most science journals....
researchers are invited to contribute and to submit manuscripts to the editors. All papers are subje...