REVIEWARTICLES OF TOPICS Digital nerve injuries: a review of predictors of sensory recovery after microsurgical digital nerve repair

# The Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Background Optimal surgical management of digital nerve lesions remains uncertain despite the publication of numer-ous studies. The purposes of this review were primarily to analyze whether there is a superior surgical technique for digital nerve repair and secondarily to statistically verify the variables to be predictors of sensory recovery. Methods A literature search was performed using PubMed including citation from MEDLINE. Studies were included if they involved patients with digital nerve lacerations in whom end-to-end neurorrhaphy, nerve grafts, conduits, or end-to-side neurorrhaphy were performed. Further, the sen-sory outcome had to be assessed according to the modified American Society for Surgery of the Hand guidelines to stratify for two-point discrimination in millimeters. The variables age, follow-up, delay in repair, type of trauma, and gap length were extracted. The association between each predictor and response was assessed using a linear mixed model and corrected for heterogeneity between stud-ies. Significance was considered present at p≤0.05. Results Of the 34 articles found, 14 articles were included giving appropriate individual data for 191 nerves. There was no statistically significant difference in outcome between operation techniques. Age and follow-up were verified pre-dictors of sensory recovery. Conclusion In this review, the type of operation for digital nerve repair does not influence sensory outcome. However, we verified outcome to be influenced by the patient’s age and the follow-up period. To add more scientific evidence to our results, larger cohort prospective studies need to be done with better detailed description of data