EDITORIAL Supporting Those Who Go to Fight Ebola

The Ebola epidemic is testing virtually every aspect of the public health and health care systems in the United States, including health care institutions ’ public service commitments. Although the number of cases in the US remains very small, an extraordinary amount of public and hospital resources have been devoted to preparing for new cases domestically [1–4]. In con-trast, although US hospital and medical professional organizations have called for an “en-hanced focus ” on containing Ebola in West Africa [5], there is a striking absence of public commitments on the part of US health care institutions to contribute to the containment effort. By quickly mobilizing qualified health care professionals (HCPs) to work in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone, US hospitals could not only meet the needs of desperate patients, but could contain Ebola at its source, averting global risk [6]. Yet, US institutions ’ response to the West African epidemic has been muted thus far. Reports indicate that many institutions—even those with a tradition of sending personnel to respond to other humanitarian crises—have asked their HCPs to stay home this time [7–9]. Although some academic medical centers (AMCs) in the US have invoked their usual polic