Background: Systematic reviews of preclinical studies, in vivo animal experiments in particular, can influence clinical research and thus even clinical care. Dissemination bias, selective dissemination of positive or significant results, is one of the major threats to validity in systematic reviews also in the realm of animal studies. We conducted a systematic review to determine the number of published systematic reviews of animal studies until present, to investigate their methodological features especially with respect to assessment of dissemination bias, and to investigate the citation of preclinical systematic reviews on clinical research. Methods: Eligible studies for this systematic review constitute systematic reviews that summarize...
Animal welfare scientific literature has accumulated rapidly in recent years, but bias may exist whi...
Contains fulltext : 133880.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Sys...
Abstract Background Systematic reviews can serve as a tool in translation of basic life sciences res...
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews of preclinical studies, in vivo animal experiments in particular, can...
Systematic reviews of preclinical studies, in vivo animal experiments in particular, can influence c...
animal experiments in particular, can influence clinical research and thus even clinical care. Diss...
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of pre-clinical studies, in vivo animal experiments...
The methodological quality of animal studies is an important factor hampering the translation of res...
BACKGROUND: The methodological quality of animal studies is an important factor hampering the transl...
In an effort to better utilize published evidence obtained from animal experiments, systematic revie...
Publication bias jeopardizes evidence-based medicine, mainly through biased literature syntheses. Pu...
Contains fulltext : 109229.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)CONTEXT: Public...
<div><p>Accumulating evidence indicates high risk of bias in preclinical animal research, questionin...
<p>Accumulating evidence indicates high risk of bias in preclinical animal research, questioning the...
Accumulating evidence indicates high risk of bias in preclinical animal research, questioning the sc...
Animal welfare scientific literature has accumulated rapidly in recent years, but bias may exist whi...
Contains fulltext : 133880.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Sys...
Abstract Background Systematic reviews can serve as a tool in translation of basic life sciences res...
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews of preclinical studies, in vivo animal experiments in particular, can...
Systematic reviews of preclinical studies, in vivo animal experiments in particular, can influence c...
animal experiments in particular, can influence clinical research and thus even clinical care. Diss...
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of pre-clinical studies, in vivo animal experiments...
The methodological quality of animal studies is an important factor hampering the translation of res...
BACKGROUND: The methodological quality of animal studies is an important factor hampering the transl...
In an effort to better utilize published evidence obtained from animal experiments, systematic revie...
Publication bias jeopardizes evidence-based medicine, mainly through biased literature syntheses. Pu...
Contains fulltext : 109229.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)CONTEXT: Public...
<div><p>Accumulating evidence indicates high risk of bias in preclinical animal research, questionin...
<p>Accumulating evidence indicates high risk of bias in preclinical animal research, questioning the...
Accumulating evidence indicates high risk of bias in preclinical animal research, questioning the sc...
Animal welfare scientific literature has accumulated rapidly in recent years, but bias may exist whi...
Contains fulltext : 133880.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Sys...
Abstract Background Systematic reviews can serve as a tool in translation of basic life sciences res...