Add to ORKGSystematic reviews need to consider applicability to disadvantaged populations: inter-rater agreement for a health equity plausibility populations and settings is warranted in systematic reviews to meet this need
Barriers and facilitators to uptake of systematic reviews by policy makers and health care managers:...
BackgroundGiven that we know that interventions shown to be effective in improving the health of a p...
A focus on equity in health can be seen in many global development goals and reports, research and i...
Background: Systematic reviews have been challenged to consider effects on disadvantaged groups. A ...
BACKGROUND: Enhancing health equity is endorsed in the Sustainable Development Goals. The failure of...
“Let’s get the best quality research we can”: public awareness and acceptance of consent to use exis...
feasibility of a checklist to assess implementation (Ch-IMP) in systematic reviews: the case of prov...
Introduction: Enhancing health equity remains of international political importance with endorsement...
Tackling health inequities both within and between countries remains high on the agenda of internati...
Introduction Health inequities are defined as unfair and avoidable differences in health between gro...
An assessment of the efficacy of searching in biomedical databases beyond MEDLINE in Conclusions: Id...
The promotion of health equity, the absence of avoidable and unfair differences in health outcomes, ...
Introduction: Health inequities are defined as unfair and avoidable differences in health between gr...
INTRODUCTION: Health inequities are defined as unfair and avoidable differences in health between gr...
monitor population health and to target interventions; at the national level, data are used for reso...
Barriers and facilitators to uptake of systematic reviews by policy makers and health care managers:...
BackgroundGiven that we know that interventions shown to be effective in improving the health of a p...
A focus on equity in health can be seen in many global development goals and reports, research and i...
Background: Systematic reviews have been challenged to consider effects on disadvantaged groups. A ...
BACKGROUND: Enhancing health equity is endorsed in the Sustainable Development Goals. The failure of...
“Let’s get the best quality research we can”: public awareness and acceptance of consent to use exis...
feasibility of a checklist to assess implementation (Ch-IMP) in systematic reviews: the case of prov...
Introduction: Enhancing health equity remains of international political importance with endorsement...
Tackling health inequities both within and between countries remains high on the agenda of internati...
Introduction Health inequities are defined as unfair and avoidable differences in health between gro...
An assessment of the efficacy of searching in biomedical databases beyond MEDLINE in Conclusions: Id...
The promotion of health equity, the absence of avoidable and unfair differences in health outcomes, ...
Introduction: Health inequities are defined as unfair and avoidable differences in health between gr...
INTRODUCTION: Health inequities are defined as unfair and avoidable differences in health between gr...
monitor population health and to target interventions; at the national level, data are used for reso...
Barriers and facilitators to uptake of systematic reviews by policy makers and health care managers:...
BackgroundGiven that we know that interventions shown to be effective in improving the health of a p...
A focus on equity in health can be seen in many global development goals and reports, research and i...