The SAB reviews the population data in the site environs as presented in the appli-cant's SAR, to determine whether the exclusion area, low population zone and popula-tion center distance for the site comply with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 100, and (at the CP stage) to determine whether the population density is such, as given in Position C.3 of Regulatory Guide 4.7, that consideration should be given by the applicant to alternate sites with lower population density. A secondary review is performed by EPLB and the written results are used by SAB to complete the overall evaluation of the facility. The EPLB reviews the low population zone (LPZ), to determine whether there is reasonable assurance that appropriate protective measures ...
The following areas of the applicant's safety analysis report (SAR) are reviewed as they relate...
At the construction permit (CP) stage of review, ETSB reviews the information in the applicant'...
GB reviews the geologic and seismic information submitted in the applicant's safety analysis re...
Reactor location is reviewed (1) as identified by latitude and longitude and by the UTM * coordinate...
The applicant's legal authority to determine all activities within the designated exclusion are...
The areas reviewed in this section of the applicant's safety analysis report (SAR) include thos...
GB reviews information in the applicant's safety analysis report (SAR) related to the existence...
The staff reviews the nature and extent of offsite activities identified in SRP Section 2.2.1-2.2.2 ...
The applicant's identification of potential accident situations in the vicinity of the plant is...
The applicant's emergency planning, as described in his Safety Analysis Report (SAR), is review...
The AEB review under this appendix covers the following areas: 1. The plant response to a control ro...
The objective of the staff’s shielding review is to determine whether the shielding design features ...
The staff reviews the applicant's assessment of aircraft hazards. The purpose of the review is ...
At the construction permit (CP) stage of review, the CMEB reviews the information in the applicant&a...
The following areas of the applicant's safety analysis report (SAR) are reviewed, as they relat...
The following areas of the applicant's safety analysis report (SAR) are reviewed as they relate...
At the construction permit (CP) stage of review, ETSB reviews the information in the applicant'...
GB reviews the geologic and seismic information submitted in the applicant's safety analysis re...
Reactor location is reviewed (1) as identified by latitude and longitude and by the UTM * coordinate...
The applicant's legal authority to determine all activities within the designated exclusion are...
The areas reviewed in this section of the applicant's safety analysis report (SAR) include thos...
GB reviews information in the applicant's safety analysis report (SAR) related to the existence...
The staff reviews the nature and extent of offsite activities identified in SRP Section 2.2.1-2.2.2 ...
The applicant's identification of potential accident situations in the vicinity of the plant is...
The applicant's emergency planning, as described in his Safety Analysis Report (SAR), is review...
The AEB review under this appendix covers the following areas: 1. The plant response to a control ro...
The objective of the staff’s shielding review is to determine whether the shielding design features ...
The staff reviews the applicant's assessment of aircraft hazards. The purpose of the review is ...
At the construction permit (CP) stage of review, the CMEB reviews the information in the applicant&a...
The following areas of the applicant's safety analysis report (SAR) are reviewed, as they relat...
The following areas of the applicant's safety analysis report (SAR) are reviewed as they relate...
At the construction permit (CP) stage of review, ETSB reviews the information in the applicant'...
GB reviews the geologic and seismic information submitted in the applicant's safety analysis re...