Add to ORKGIn the northeastern portion of the Indian subcontinent, the presence of two language families stretches back into prehistory. What light can historical linguistics, linguistic palaeontology, archaeology, palaeoeth-nobotany and human population genetics shed on the ancient origins of Austroasiatic and Tibeto-Burman? Which new questions arise from these interdisciplinary insights
<div><p>The greater Himalayan region demarcates two of the most prominent linguistic phyla in Asia: ...
The greater Himalayan region demarcates two of the most prominent linguistic phyla in Asia: Tibeto-B...
The greater Himalayan region demarcates two of the most prominent linguistic phyla in Asia: Tibeto-B...
A polyphyletic understanding of Asian linguistic diversity was first propagated in 1823. Since 1901,...
This Trans-Himalayan tale unites two narratives, an historical account of scholarly thinking regardi...
This volume provides the most up-to-date and holistic but compact account of the peopling of the wor...
There are a number of competing theories about the origins of the Himalayan peoples. These theories ...
Sagart L, Jacques G, Lai Y, et al. Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tib...
Sagart L, Jacques G, Lai Y, et al. Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tib...
South Asia is an ethnolinguistically inordinately complex portion of the planet. The topography of t...
The author examines the conducts and relations between the different language families in Nepalese H...
There are a number of competing theories about the origins of the Himalayan peoples. These theories ...
Kho-Bwa, Hrusish, Mishmic, Tani, and Tshangla are language clusters that have been recurrently propo...
The greater Himalayan region demarcates two of the most prominent linguistic phyla in Asia: Tibeto-B...
Kho-Bwa, Hrusish, Mishmic, Tani, and Tshangla are language clusters that have been recurrently propo...
<div><p>The greater Himalayan region demarcates two of the most prominent linguistic phyla in Asia: ...
The greater Himalayan region demarcates two of the most prominent linguistic phyla in Asia: Tibeto-B...
The greater Himalayan region demarcates two of the most prominent linguistic phyla in Asia: Tibeto-B...
A polyphyletic understanding of Asian linguistic diversity was first propagated in 1823. Since 1901,...
This Trans-Himalayan tale unites two narratives, an historical account of scholarly thinking regardi...
This volume provides the most up-to-date and holistic but compact account of the peopling of the wor...
There are a number of competing theories about the origins of the Himalayan peoples. These theories ...
Sagart L, Jacques G, Lai Y, et al. Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tib...
Sagart L, Jacques G, Lai Y, et al. Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tib...
South Asia is an ethnolinguistically inordinately complex portion of the planet. The topography of t...
The author examines the conducts and relations between the different language families in Nepalese H...
There are a number of competing theories about the origins of the Himalayan peoples. These theories ...
Kho-Bwa, Hrusish, Mishmic, Tani, and Tshangla are language clusters that have been recurrently propo...
The greater Himalayan region demarcates two of the most prominent linguistic phyla in Asia: Tibeto-B...
Kho-Bwa, Hrusish, Mishmic, Tani, and Tshangla are language clusters that have been recurrently propo...
<div><p>The greater Himalayan region demarcates two of the most prominent linguistic phyla in Asia: ...
The greater Himalayan region demarcates two of the most prominent linguistic phyla in Asia: Tibeto-B...
The greater Himalayan region demarcates two of the most prominent linguistic phyla in Asia: Tibeto-B...