Board of Regents Commentary Qualifications of Pharmacists Who Provide Direct Patient Care: Perspectives on the Need for Residency Training

In 2006, the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) released a position statement and a white paper to provide the College’s viewpoints on the importance of postgraduate pharmacy residency train-ing as a prerequisite for direct patient care practice and the vision that future clinical pharmacists engaged in direct patient care would be certified by the Board of Pharmacy Specialties (BPS). Since the release of these papers, some members of the pharmacy profession have interpreted ACCP’s position as maintaining that all pharmacists—regardless of the focus of their professional practice activities— should complete formal postgraduate residency training and be board-certified specialists. That inter-pretation is not accurate. In this commentary, ACCP further defines “direct patient care ” and states that it believes that clinical pharmacists engaged in direct patient care should be board certified (i.e., and residency-trained or otherwise board eligible) and have established a valid collaborative drug ther-apy management (CDTM) agreement or have been formally granted clinical privileges. The rationale for this viewpoint is presented in detail. The pharmacy profession has appropriately invested substan-tial resources to ensure the quality of its accredited residency training programs and board certification processes. ACCP believes that these training and certification programs are essential steps in preparing clinical pharmacists to provide direct patient care. KEY WORDS pharmacists, direct patient care, board certification, residency training, clinical pharmacist