We list here three different peaks with close masses and widths seen in the mass distributions of ωω, ηη′, and K+K − final states. ALDE 91B argues that they are of different nature. f2(1910) MASS f2(1910) ωω MOD
The c-quark mass corresponds to the “running ” mass mc (µ = mc) in the MS scheme. We have converted ...
1672.4 ± 3.2 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.4. See the ideogram below
We have omitted some results that have been superseded by later experiments. See our earlier edition...
Contains results mostly from formation experiments. For further pro-duction experiments see the Furt...
1232 ±3 CUTKOSKY 80 IPWA πN → πN 1233 ±2 HOEHLER 79 IPWA πN → πN • • • We do not use the following...
This entry was previously called U0(2350). Contains results mostly from formation experiments. For f...
p MASS (atomic mass units u) The mass is known much more precisely in u (atomic mass units) than in ...
Older results have been retained simply because there is little infor-mation at all about this possi...
∼ 1400 5 ACHASOV 98H RVUE e+ e − → ωpi+pi− ∼ 1460 6 ACHASOV 98H RVUE e+ e − → K+K− 1440 ± 70 7 CLE...
tripling the scaling S-factors applied to the uncertainties to account for model-dependence, handlin...
1281.8 ± 0.6 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.6. See the ideogram below. 1281 ± 2 ± 1 AU...
The spin-parity has not been measured but is expected to be 3/2−: this is presumably the charm count...
Seen by ABLIKIM 13X in e+ e − → pi+pi−hc at c.m. energy from 3.90 to 4.42 GeV as a peak in the inva...
The c-quark mass corresponds to the “running ” mass mc (µ = mc) in the MS scheme. We have converted ...
Seen in antinucleon-nucleon annihilation at rest. Needs confirma-tion. f2(1565) MASS VALUE (MeV) DOC...
The c-quark mass corresponds to the “running ” mass mc (µ = mc) in the MS scheme. We have converted ...
1672.4 ± 3.2 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.4. See the ideogram below
We have omitted some results that have been superseded by later experiments. See our earlier edition...
Contains results mostly from formation experiments. For further pro-duction experiments see the Furt...
1232 ±3 CUTKOSKY 80 IPWA πN → πN 1233 ±2 HOEHLER 79 IPWA πN → πN • • • We do not use the following...
This entry was previously called U0(2350). Contains results mostly from formation experiments. For f...
p MASS (atomic mass units u) The mass is known much more precisely in u (atomic mass units) than in ...
Older results have been retained simply because there is little infor-mation at all about this possi...
∼ 1400 5 ACHASOV 98H RVUE e+ e − → ωpi+pi− ∼ 1460 6 ACHASOV 98H RVUE e+ e − → K+K− 1440 ± 70 7 CLE...
tripling the scaling S-factors applied to the uncertainties to account for model-dependence, handlin...
1281.8 ± 0.6 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.6. See the ideogram below. 1281 ± 2 ± 1 AU...
The spin-parity has not been measured but is expected to be 3/2−: this is presumably the charm count...
Seen by ABLIKIM 13X in e+ e − → pi+pi−hc at c.m. energy from 3.90 to 4.42 GeV as a peak in the inva...
The c-quark mass corresponds to the “running ” mass mc (µ = mc) in the MS scheme. We have converted ...
Seen in antinucleon-nucleon annihilation at rest. Needs confirma-tion. f2(1565) MASS VALUE (MeV) DOC...
The c-quark mass corresponds to the “running ” mass mc (µ = mc) in the MS scheme. We have converted ...
1672.4 ± 3.2 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.4. See the ideogram below
We have omitted some results that have been superseded by later experiments. See our earlier edition...