Necessary changes in translation ideology

Three major problems in modem translation ideology were identified and the researcher proposed changes necessary for advancements in the development of translation theories and translation technology. Traditionally, the development in translation theory has created a translation ideology that has focused on the faithfulness and the accuracy of target texts in representing the source texts, encouraging translators and interpreters to become neutral conduits in the language-transferring process. Based on related literature, Bakhtin's Dialogic Model, and Speech Act Theory, I identified three problems in the current translation ideology: (a) an overemphasis on Conduit Model; (b) simplification on the roles of translators; and ( c) Quixotism in finding the "best " translation. I suggested that the development of translation theories and ideologies should move toward the Dialogic Model suggested by Bakhtin, which emphasizes the co-construction of contexts and meanings of all participants involved in the communicative process. I proposed a normative approach, which focuses on the practice of translation and interpretation, in developing translation theories, and Studies of Translation and Interpretation, Vo!.7 discussed its implications for translation technology. By understanding the active roles translators and interpreters can play and do play and by recognizing the importance and the benefits of such phenomena, it is evident that the emphasis of translation technology should not be eliminating the presence of translators and interpreters or be creating the "best " target text. Rather, a good translation program should involve translators and interpreters in the decision-making process of translation and interpretation, providing necessary information and contexts for translators and interpreters