Efficient multiprogramming for multicores with

As hardware becomes increasingly parallel and the avail-ability of scalable parallel software improves, the problem of managing multiple multithreaded applications (processes) becomes important. Malleable processes, which can vary the number of threads used as they run, enable sophisticated and flexible resource management. Although many existing ap-plications parallelized for SMPs with parallel runtimes are in fact already malleable, deployed run-time environments provide no interface nor any strategy for intelligently allo-cating hardware threads or even preventing oversubscrip-tion. Work up until SCAF either depends upon profiling applications ahead of time in order to make good decisions about allocations, or does not account for process efficiency at all. This paper presents the Scheduling and Allocation with Feedback (SCAF) system, a drop-in runtime solution which supports existing malleable applications in making intelligent allocation decisions based on observed efficiency without any paradigm change, changes to semantics, pro-gram modification, offline profiling, or even recompilation. Our existing implementation can control most unmodified OpenMP applications. Other malleable threading libraries can also easily be supported with small modifications, with-out requiring application modification. In this work, we present the SCAF daemon and a SCAF-aware port of the GNU OpenMP runtime. We demonstrate that applications running on the SCAF runtime still per-form well when executing on a quiescent system. We present a new technique for estimating process efficiency purely at runtime using available hardware counters, and demonstrate its effectiveness in aiding allocation decisions. We evaluated SCAF using NAS NPB parallel benchmarks. When run concurrently pairwise, 70 % of benchmark pairs on an 8-core Xeon processor saw improvements averaging 15% in sum of speedups compared to equipartitioning. For a 64-context Sparc T2 processor, 57 % of pairs saw a similar 15% improvement. The improvement was 45 % vs. equipartition-ing when three selected benchmarks were concurrently run