Most subjective probability aggregation procedures use a single prob-ability judgment from each expert, even though it is common for experts studying real problems to update their probability estimates over time. This paper advances into unexplored areas of probability aggregation by consid-ering a dynamic context in which experts can update their beliefs at random intervals. The updates occur very infrequently, resulting in a sparse data set that cannot be modeled by standard time-series procedures. In response to the lack of appropriate methodology, this paper presents a hierarchical model that takes into account the expert’s level of self-reported expertise and produces aggregate probabilities that are sharp and well calibrated both in- ...
Policy makers use expert judgment opinions elicited from experts as probability distributions, quant...
When dealing with time series with complex non-stationarities, low retrospective regret on individua...
How frequent are large disagreements in human judgment? The substantial literature relating to exper...
Most subjective probability aggregation procedures use a single probability judgment from each exper...
We consider a panel of experts asked to assign probabilities to events, both logi-cally simple and c...
In order to improve forecasts, a decision-maker often combines probabilities given by various source...
Summary. Randomness in scientific estimation is generally assumed to arise from unmea-sured or uncon...
Structured protocols offer a transparent and systematic way to elicit and combine/aggregate, probabi...
We consider the task of aggregating beliefs of sev-eral experts. We assume that these beliefs are re...
<p>Randomness in scientific estimation is generally assumed to arise from unmeasured or uncontrolled...
Includes bibliographical references (p. 141-144).Opinion pooling involves the process of combining t...
Research has shown that aggregation of independent expert judgments significantly improves the quali...
This paper presents a maximum entropy framework for the aggregation of expert opinions where the exp...
This study introduces a new forecast aggregation technique. Adding to the well- known difficulties a...
Previously held under moratorium from 21st November 2017 until 21st November 2022.Mathematical aggre...
Policy makers use expert judgment opinions elicited from experts as probability distributions, quant...
When dealing with time series with complex non-stationarities, low retrospective regret on individua...
How frequent are large disagreements in human judgment? The substantial literature relating to exper...
Most subjective probability aggregation procedures use a single probability judgment from each exper...
We consider a panel of experts asked to assign probabilities to events, both logi-cally simple and c...
In order to improve forecasts, a decision-maker often combines probabilities given by various source...
Summary. Randomness in scientific estimation is generally assumed to arise from unmea-sured or uncon...
Structured protocols offer a transparent and systematic way to elicit and combine/aggregate, probabi...
We consider the task of aggregating beliefs of sev-eral experts. We assume that these beliefs are re...
<p>Randomness in scientific estimation is generally assumed to arise from unmeasured or uncontrolled...
Includes bibliographical references (p. 141-144).Opinion pooling involves the process of combining t...
Research has shown that aggregation of independent expert judgments significantly improves the quali...
This paper presents a maximum entropy framework for the aggregation of expert opinions where the exp...
This study introduces a new forecast aggregation technique. Adding to the well- known difficulties a...
Previously held under moratorium from 21st November 2017 until 21st November 2022.Mathematical aggre...
Policy makers use expert judgment opinions elicited from experts as probability distributions, quant...
When dealing with time series with complex non-stationarities, low retrospective regret on individua...
How frequent are large disagreements in human judgment? The substantial literature relating to exper...