Wikipedia needs to attract and retain newcomers while also increasing the quality of its content. Yet new Wikipedia users are disproportionately affected by the quality assur-ance mechanisms designed to thwart spammers and pro-moters. English Wikipedia’s Articles for Creation provides a protected space for drafting new articles, which are reviewed against minimum quality guidelines before they are pub-lished. In this study we explore how this drafting process has affected the productivity of newcomers in Wikipedia. Us-ing a mixed qualitative and quantitative approach, we show how the process’s pre-publication review, which is intended to improve the success of newcomers, in fact decreases new-comer productivity in English Wikipedia and offe...
User participation is vital to the success of collaborative crowdsourcing platforms such as Wikipedi...
Although some have argued that Wikipedia\u27s open edit policy is one of the primary reasons for its...
Wikipedia is defined by its founders as the “free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.” This property,...
Wikipedia needs to attract and retain newcomers while also increasing the quality of its content. Ye...
Many online communities rely on postpublication moderation where contributors, even those that are p...
Unlike traditional firms, open collaborative systems rely on volunteers to operate, and many communi...
International audienceConcerns have been raisedabout the decreased ability of Wikipedia to recruit e...
Wikipedia is a highly successful example of what mass col-laboration in an informal peer review syst...
Wikipedia’s success is often attributed to involving large numbers of contributors who improve the a...
Is it an encyclopedia or a social network? Without considering both aspects it would not be possible...
The dichotomy of Wikipedia: many love it, and many others love to hate it. While students may not en...
Wikipedia is known as a convenient source of user generated information for a wide range of topics, ...
New contributors to Wikipedia face daunting technical and social challenges, contributing to ongoing...
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Wikipedia’s internal quality control ...
The existence of a shared classification system is essential to knowledge production, transfer, and ...
User participation is vital to the success of collaborative crowdsourcing platforms such as Wikipedi...
Although some have argued that Wikipedia\u27s open edit policy is one of the primary reasons for its...
Wikipedia is defined by its founders as the “free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.” This property,...
Wikipedia needs to attract and retain newcomers while also increasing the quality of its content. Ye...
Many online communities rely on postpublication moderation where contributors, even those that are p...
Unlike traditional firms, open collaborative systems rely on volunteers to operate, and many communi...
International audienceConcerns have been raisedabout the decreased ability of Wikipedia to recruit e...
Wikipedia is a highly successful example of what mass col-laboration in an informal peer review syst...
Wikipedia’s success is often attributed to involving large numbers of contributors who improve the a...
Is it an encyclopedia or a social network? Without considering both aspects it would not be possible...
The dichotomy of Wikipedia: many love it, and many others love to hate it. While students may not en...
Wikipedia is known as a convenient source of user generated information for a wide range of topics, ...
New contributors to Wikipedia face daunting technical and social challenges, contributing to ongoing...
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Wikipedia’s internal quality control ...
The existence of a shared classification system is essential to knowledge production, transfer, and ...
User participation is vital to the success of collaborative crowdsourcing platforms such as Wikipedi...
Although some have argued that Wikipedia\u27s open edit policy is one of the primary reasons for its...
Wikipedia is defined by its founders as the “free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.” This property,...