In the present paper, we provide a formalised version of a merged argumentative and story-based approach towards the analysis of evidence. As an application, we are able to show how our approach sheds new light on inference to the best explanation with case evidence. More specifically, it will be clarified how the events in a case story that are considered to be proven abductively explain the otherwise unproven events of the case story. We compare our approach with existing AI work on modelling legal reasoning with evidence
As a result of recent scandals concerning evidence and proof in the administration of criminal justi...
As a result of recent scandals concerning evidence and proof in the administration of criminal justi...
Sense-making software for crime investigation should be based on a model of reasoning about evidenc...
In the present paper, we provide a formalised version of a merged argumentative and story-based appr...
In the present paper, we provide a formalised version of a merged argumentative and story-based appr...
Abstract. This paper concerns the reasoning with stories, evidence and generali-sations in a legal c...
This paper concerns the reasoning with stories, evidence and generalisations in a legal context. We ...
This paper presents a theory of reasoning with evidence in order to determine the facts in a crimina...
Sense-making software for crime investigation should be based on a model of reasoning about evidence...
Sense-making software for crime investigation should be based on a model of reasoning about evidence...
We present a computational argumentation approach that models legal reasoning with evidence and proo...
Sense-making software for crime investigation should be based on a model of reasoning about evidence...
Abstract In this paper, we continue our research on a hybrid narrative-argumentative approach to evi...
As a result of recent scandals concerning evidence and proof in the administration of criminal justi...
As a result of recent scandals concerning evidence and proof in the administration of criminal justi...
Sense-making software for crime investigation should be based on a model of reasoning about evidenc...
In the present paper, we provide a formalised version of a merged argumentative and story-based appr...
In the present paper, we provide a formalised version of a merged argumentative and story-based appr...
Abstract. This paper concerns the reasoning with stories, evidence and generali-sations in a legal c...
This paper concerns the reasoning with stories, evidence and generalisations in a legal context. We ...
This paper presents a theory of reasoning with evidence in order to determine the facts in a crimina...
Sense-making software for crime investigation should be based on a model of reasoning about evidence...
Sense-making software for crime investigation should be based on a model of reasoning about evidence...
We present a computational argumentation approach that models legal reasoning with evidence and proo...
Sense-making software for crime investigation should be based on a model of reasoning about evidence...
Abstract In this paper, we continue our research on a hybrid narrative-argumentative approach to evi...
As a result of recent scandals concerning evidence and proof in the administration of criminal justi...
As a result of recent scandals concerning evidence and proof in the administration of criminal justi...
Sense-making software for crime investigation should be based on a model of reasoning about evidenc...