In this paper, we will sketch the basic system of Justification Logic, which is a general logical framework for reasoning about epistemic justification. Justification Logic renders a new, evidence-based foundation for epistemic logic. As a case study, we compare formalizations of the Kripke ‘Red Barn ’ scenario in modal epistemic logic and Justification Logic and show here that the latter provides a deeper analysis. In particular, we argue that modal language fails to fully represent the epistemic closure principle whereas Justification Logic provides its adequate formalization.
Justification logics are a family of modal logics whose non-normal modalities are parametrised by a ...
AbstractJustification logic studies epistemic and provability phenomena by introducing justification...
This work is focused on the interconnections between evidence, knowledge, and justification. I defen...
We describe a general logical framework, Justification Logic, for reasoning about epistemic justific...
Justification logics are constructive analogues of modal logics. As such, they provide perspicuous m...
Theories of epistemic justification are commonly assessed by exploring their predictions about parti...
today We describe a formal theory of justification, Justification Logic, based on classical proposit...
Justification Logic provides an axiomatic description of justifica-tions and delegates the question ...
The logic of justification provides an in-depth analysis of the epistemic states of an agent. This p...
What do we mean when we say that a belief is justified? What justifies a belief? These are two very ...
AbstractIn this paper we introduce the justified knowledge operator J with the intended meaning of J...
We develop an abstract theory of justifications suitable for describing the semantics of a range of ...
Justification logics are constructive analogues of modal logics. They are often used as epistemic lo...
Justification Logic is an emerging field that studies provability, knowledge, and belief via explici...
As George Boole saw it, the laws of logic are the laws of thought, and by this he meant, not that hu...
Justification logics are a family of modal logics whose non-normal modalities are parametrised by a ...
AbstractJustification logic studies epistemic and provability phenomena by introducing justification...
This work is focused on the interconnections between evidence, knowledge, and justification. I defen...
We describe a general logical framework, Justification Logic, for reasoning about epistemic justific...
Justification logics are constructive analogues of modal logics. As such, they provide perspicuous m...
Theories of epistemic justification are commonly assessed by exploring their predictions about parti...
today We describe a formal theory of justification, Justification Logic, based on classical proposit...
Justification Logic provides an axiomatic description of justifica-tions and delegates the question ...
The logic of justification provides an in-depth analysis of the epistemic states of an agent. This p...
What do we mean when we say that a belief is justified? What justifies a belief? These are two very ...
AbstractIn this paper we introduce the justified knowledge operator J with the intended meaning of J...
We develop an abstract theory of justifications suitable for describing the semantics of a range of ...
Justification logics are constructive analogues of modal logics. They are often used as epistemic lo...
Justification Logic is an emerging field that studies provability, knowledge, and belief via explici...
As George Boole saw it, the laws of logic are the laws of thought, and by this he meant, not that hu...
Justification logics are a family of modal logics whose non-normal modalities are parametrised by a ...
AbstractJustification logic studies epistemic and provability phenomena by introducing justification...
This work is focused on the interconnections between evidence, knowledge, and justification. I defen...