Academic rankings mediate between the differing goals of the “republic of science ” and of “new public management”. Nevertheless, rankings recently have come under scrutiny. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of academic rankings, in particular, their unintended negative consequences on the research process, and conclude that academic rankings do not fulfil their intended goal. We discuss input control, that is, rigorous selection and socialization, supplemented by periodic self-evaluation and awards as a way to mitigate the tensions between the concept of the “republic of science ” and “new public management”. (89 words
<div><p>Introduction</p><p>Concerns about reproducibility and impact of research urge improvement in...
University rankings have gradually become an issue for concern in the academic community worldwide. ...
In the last decades, most countries in the western world have introduced some form of centralized qu...
Academic rankings today are the backbone of research governance, which seem to fit the aims of “new ...
Evaluations of academic departments through peer review rankings have assumed importance in decision...
Academia has an ambivalent relationship with rankings. Academics complain constantly about them; yet...
Inspired by recent discussions of the systematic costs that external rankings impose on academic ins...
Has university scholarship gone astray? Do our academic assessment systems reward scholarship that a...
University rankings represent a controversial issue in the debate about higher education policy. A g...
European Journal of Education, vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 45-59University rankings widely affect the behavi...
Brankovic J. Academia’s Stockholm Syndrome: The Ambivalent Status of Rankings in Higher Education (R...
Concerns about reproducibility and impact of research urge improvement initiatives. Current universi...
In comparison to previous research to develop a ranking system within public administration, this wo...
A commodity appears, at first sight, a very trivial thing, and easily under-stood. Its analysis show...
The bulk of research on academic rankings is policy-oriented, preoccupied with 'best practices', and...
<div><p>Introduction</p><p>Concerns about reproducibility and impact of research urge improvement in...
University rankings have gradually become an issue for concern in the academic community worldwide. ...
In the last decades, most countries in the western world have introduced some form of centralized qu...
Academic rankings today are the backbone of research governance, which seem to fit the aims of “new ...
Evaluations of academic departments through peer review rankings have assumed importance in decision...
Academia has an ambivalent relationship with rankings. Academics complain constantly about them; yet...
Inspired by recent discussions of the systematic costs that external rankings impose on academic ins...
Has university scholarship gone astray? Do our academic assessment systems reward scholarship that a...
University rankings represent a controversial issue in the debate about higher education policy. A g...
European Journal of Education, vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 45-59University rankings widely affect the behavi...
Brankovic J. Academia’s Stockholm Syndrome: The Ambivalent Status of Rankings in Higher Education (R...
Concerns about reproducibility and impact of research urge improvement initiatives. Current universi...
In comparison to previous research to develop a ranking system within public administration, this wo...
A commodity appears, at first sight, a very trivial thing, and easily under-stood. Its analysis show...
The bulk of research on academic rankings is policy-oriented, preoccupied with 'best practices', and...
<div><p>Introduction</p><p>Concerns about reproducibility and impact of research urge improvement in...
University rankings have gradually become an issue for concern in the academic community worldwide. ...
In the last decades, most countries in the western world have introduced some form of centralized qu...