1 Method development for qualitative research on interpretation-finding

Background in muic education. Musicians ’ interpretations are related to their familiarity with traditions represented by the works they play, and influenced by their individual ways of conceptualising music (Hultberg, 2000). Musicians on a high level develop complex strategies while preparing a performance (Nielsen, 1998) and structure their work according to the musical form (Chaffin, 2002). Since interpretation-finding related to performance practice has been little explored methods for studying entire works in natural settings need to be developed (Juslin, 2002). Background in artistic research. The use of notation presumes a common understanding of performance practice of composers and interpreters, as has been demonstrated in historical manuals (Quantz, 1752). Today many composers relate to various ethnic traditions. Their intentions may diverge from conventions taken for granted in Western traditional notation. Yet, manuals for contemporary music mainly concern technical advice (Dick, 1996). Hence, there is a need for exploring functions and limitations of notation as a communicator between composer and interpreter. Aims. This joint project aimed at developing methods for exploring interpretation-finding through traditional notation of works from different periods. In a study on Stefan’s preparation of works by J. S. Bach and P. Nørgård we especially aimed at exploring effects of cooperation between an artist researching his own interpretation, and an observing researcher who is also an experienced performer