The appeal to possible worlds in the semantics of modal logic and the philosophical defense of possible worlds as an essential element of ontology have led philosophers and logicians to introduce other kinds of ‘worlds ’ in order to study various philosophical and logical phenomena. The literature contains discussions of ‘non-normal worlds’,1 ‘non-classical worlds’,2 ‘non-standard worlds’,3 and ‘impossible worlds’.4 These atypi-cal worlds have been used in the following ways: (1) to interpret unusual modal logics, (2) to distinguish logically equivalent propositions, (3) to solve the problems associated with propositional attitude contexts, inten-tional contexts, and counterfactuals with impossible antecedents, and (4) to interpret systems ...