tiated a discussion on Hittite ammuk ‘me’. The central question is: where did the geminate come from? This has led me to reconsider the origin of the Indo-European personal pronouns against the background of my reconstruction of Indo-Uralic (2002: 221-225). For the historical data I may refer to Schmidt (1978). On the basis of the Indo-European evidence, the personal pronouns can be re
A close look at the personal endings of IE verbs reveals a surprising degree of uncertainty concerni...
Hittite and Tocharian share an interrogative pronominal stem in m-next to the well known Proto-Indo-...
C.C. Uhlenbeck made a distinction between two components of Proto-Indo-European, which he called A a...
In the Indo-European department of Leiden University, Alwin Kloekhorst has initiated a discussion on...
This study investigates systematically the emergence and establishment of geminate consonants as a ...
After our first study in the field of Indo-European personal pronouns (Dočkalová & Blažek 2010, 2011...
In the field of Hittite linguistic studies, recent scholarship has been especially interested in the...
In this paper, I will discuss the origin of the different nominal accent-ablaut paradigms that can b...
The present work compares the verbal endings of the singular of some ancient I.E. languages showing ...
Hittite shows that the ”genericum”, as a noun referring to people underspecified for gender, is a t...
Starting from the analysis of constructions employed to express the category of reflexive in Hittite,...
This article investigates the problem of the lexeme for ‘apple’ in the reconstructed Indo-European f...
The field of studies related to cognitive linguistics is widely investigated in literature. However,...
C.C. Uhlenbeck made a distinction between two components of Proto-Indo-European, which he called A a...
International audienceDiscussion of the suffixes which can be traced back to Proto-Indo-European *-i...
A close look at the personal endings of IE verbs reveals a surprising degree of uncertainty concerni...
Hittite and Tocharian share an interrogative pronominal stem in m-next to the well known Proto-Indo-...
C.C. Uhlenbeck made a distinction between two components of Proto-Indo-European, which he called A a...
In the Indo-European department of Leiden University, Alwin Kloekhorst has initiated a discussion on...
This study investigates systematically the emergence and establishment of geminate consonants as a ...
After our first study in the field of Indo-European personal pronouns (Dočkalová & Blažek 2010, 2011...
In the field of Hittite linguistic studies, recent scholarship has been especially interested in the...
In this paper, I will discuss the origin of the different nominal accent-ablaut paradigms that can b...
The present work compares the verbal endings of the singular of some ancient I.E. languages showing ...
Hittite shows that the ”genericum”, as a noun referring to people underspecified for gender, is a t...
Starting from the analysis of constructions employed to express the category of reflexive in Hittite,...
This article investigates the problem of the lexeme for ‘apple’ in the reconstructed Indo-European f...
The field of studies related to cognitive linguistics is widely investigated in literature. However,...
C.C. Uhlenbeck made a distinction between two components of Proto-Indo-European, which he called A a...
International audienceDiscussion of the suffixes which can be traced back to Proto-Indo-European *-i...
A close look at the personal endings of IE verbs reveals a surprising degree of uncertainty concerni...
Hittite and Tocharian share an interrogative pronominal stem in m-next to the well known Proto-Indo-...
C.C. Uhlenbeck made a distinction between two components of Proto-Indo-European, which he called A a...