Add to ORKGProblem one: why, if God designed the human mind, did it take so long for humans to develop theistic concepts and beliefs? Problem two: why would God use evolution to design the living world when the dis-covery of evolution would predictably contribute to so much nonbelief in God? Darwin was aware of such questions but failed to see their evi-dential significance for theism. This paper explores this significance. Problem one introduces something I call natural nonbelief, which is sig-nificant because it parallels and corroborates well-known worries about natural evil. Problems one and two, especially when combined, support naturalism over theism, intensify the problem of divine hiddenness, challenge Alvin Plantinga’s views about the natural...
Phillip Johnson, in a number of recent writings, most notably in his 1991 book, Darwin on Trial. has...
The growing religion-based challenge to the concept of evolution is prompting some new thinking abou...
Creationist Phillip E. Johnson argues that evolution theory is a product of a bias toward naturalist...
I show that at present times there is a conflict between natural science and religion (Christian the...
Several recent works in theology have argued that evolutionary theory is compatible with theism. Thi...
Introducing non-Darwinian mind as a nonaptation (raw materials of evolution) I argue that Darwinian ...
The way scientists responded to evolutionary ideas can yield powerful insights into understanding th...
Today, many would assume that Charles Darwin absolutely rejected any claim of intelligent design in ...
In focusing on the story of Darwin\u27s religious doubts, scholars too often overlook Darwin\u27s po...
In the description of Darwin’s life and work, a common assumption is that he gradually lost all beli...
The purpose of this article is to put forward an acceptable scriptural stance with respect to an ev...
Theory of evolution is identified with naturalistic view of science itself and considered ...
The basic outline for a different perspective on the Theory of Evolution has been described in this ...
Charles Darwin, in his discussions with Asa Gray and in his published works, doubted whether God cou...
It is often assumed that there is a hard line between theistic evolution (TE) and intelligent design...
Phillip Johnson, in a number of recent writings, most notably in his 1991 book, Darwin on Trial. has...
The growing religion-based challenge to the concept of evolution is prompting some new thinking abou...
Creationist Phillip E. Johnson argues that evolution theory is a product of a bias toward naturalist...
I show that at present times there is a conflict between natural science and religion (Christian the...
Several recent works in theology have argued that evolutionary theory is compatible with theism. Thi...
Introducing non-Darwinian mind as a nonaptation (raw materials of evolution) I argue that Darwinian ...
The way scientists responded to evolutionary ideas can yield powerful insights into understanding th...
Today, many would assume that Charles Darwin absolutely rejected any claim of intelligent design in ...
In focusing on the story of Darwin\u27s religious doubts, scholars too often overlook Darwin\u27s po...
In the description of Darwin’s life and work, a common assumption is that he gradually lost all beli...
The purpose of this article is to put forward an acceptable scriptural stance with respect to an ev...
Theory of evolution is identified with naturalistic view of science itself and considered ...
The basic outline for a different perspective on the Theory of Evolution has been described in this ...
Charles Darwin, in his discussions with Asa Gray and in his published works, doubted whether God cou...
It is often assumed that there is a hard line between theistic evolution (TE) and intelligent design...
Phillip Johnson, in a number of recent writings, most notably in his 1991 book, Darwin on Trial. has...
The growing religion-based challenge to the concept of evolution is prompting some new thinking abou...
Creationist Phillip E. Johnson argues that evolution theory is a product of a bias toward naturalist...