Task Force (USPSTF) breast cancer screening recommendations are welcome and reflect the best available current evidence (1). The updated systematic review by Nelson and colleagues (2), which is the basis for the changes, concurs substantially with the relevant Co-chrane review on mammography and, indeed, the Cochrane review of breast self-examination or clinical examination (3, 4). Persons raising concerns about Nelson and colleagues ’ review should be reassured that the summary breast cancer mortality reduc-tion of 15 % from screening mammography is similar to that pre-sented in the Cochrane review, which was performed independently, and leads to similar estimates of the numbers needed to invite for examination to prevent or delay 1 death ...
(USPSTF) recently published updated guidelines for HIV screening (1). In preparing these guidelines,...
DESCRIPTION: Update of the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on scree...
Author's comment: Reprinted from: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 101(17), 2009, 1216-122
Description: Update of the 2002 U. S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation stateme...
TO THE EDITOR: Screening is more effective when the incidence of the target disease is high (that is...
TO THE EDITOR: In the updated systematic review on the effects of screening mammography in women age...
tively estimated the aggregate cost of screening mammography in the United States under several scen...
their systematic review of the long-term effects of false-positive mam-mography (1). We are currentl...
with great interest. Legislation about breast density notifica-tion is motivated by the low sensitiv...
Force (USPSTF) recommendation statement on screening for breast cancer in the general population. Me...
(1), which compares several multigene signatures for breast cancer prognosis, states that for the Ma...
Despite the marked increase in mammographic screening to detect clinically occult, earlier-stage bre...
iklidis covers a lot of ground, and there is much to agree with. Certainly, we should be moving forw...
(USPSTF) recently published updated guidelines for HIV screening (1). In preparing these guidelines,...
DESCRIPTION: Update of the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on scree...
Author's comment: Reprinted from: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 101(17), 2009, 1216-122
Description: Update of the 2002 U. S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation stateme...
TO THE EDITOR: Screening is more effective when the incidence of the target disease is high (that is...
TO THE EDITOR: In the updated systematic review on the effects of screening mammography in women age...
tively estimated the aggregate cost of screening mammography in the United States under several scen...
their systematic review of the long-term effects of false-positive mam-mography (1). We are currentl...
with great interest. Legislation about breast density notifica-tion is motivated by the low sensitiv...
Force (USPSTF) recommendation statement on screening for breast cancer in the general population. Me...
(1), which compares several multigene signatures for breast cancer prognosis, states that for the Ma...
Despite the marked increase in mammographic screening to detect clinically occult, earlier-stage bre...
iklidis covers a lot of ground, and there is much to agree with. Certainly, we should be moving forw...
(USPSTF) recently published updated guidelines for HIV screening (1). In preparing these guidelines,...
DESCRIPTION: Update of the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on scree...
Author's comment: Reprinted from: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 101(17), 2009, 1216-122