Decoherence and its role in the modern measurement problem, http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1111.2187 (to appear in a special issue of Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society

Decoherence is widely felt to have something to do with the quantum measurement problem, but getting clear on just what is made difficult by the fact that the “measurement problem”, as traditionally presented in foundational and philosophical discussions, has become somewhat discon-nected from the conceptual problems posed by real physics. This, in turn, is because quantum mechanics as discussed in textbooks and in founda-tional discussions has become somewhat removed from scientific practice, especially where the analysis of measurement is concerned. This paper has two goals: firstly (sections 1–2), to present an account of how quantum measurements are actually dealt with in modern physics (hint: it doesn’t involve a collapse of the wavefunction) and to state the measurement problem from the perspective of that account; and secondly (sections 3–4), to clarify what role decoherence plays in modern measure-ment theory and what effect it has on the various strategies that have been proposed to solve the measurement problem. 1 The myth of the “conventional interpretation” Foundational discussions of quantum theory have a tendency to talk about the “conventional ” or “orthodox ” or “standard ” interpretation of quantum mechan-ics. It’s not generally very clear what’s meant by this, but a rough stab might be that it consists of these two principles: 1. (the Measurement Algorithm) Observable quantities are represented by self-adjoint operators; the possible outcomes of a measurement of some observable are the eigenvalues of the associated operator; the probability of a given measurement outcome obtaining is given by the usual (Born) probability rule. 2. (the Projection Postulate) While in the absence of measurement a sys-tem evolves unitarily and deterministically, according to the Schrödinge