Add to ORKGTwo methods for comparing impact factors and citation rates across fields of science are tested against each other using citations to the 3,705 journals in the Science Citation Index 2010 (CD-Rom version of SCI) and the 1
For comparisons of citation impacts across fields and over time, bibliometricians normalize the obse...
<p>Evaluative bibliometrics compares the citation impact of researchers, research groups and institu...
normalisation; a priori normalisation; fractional citation; citation network; citation transactions;...
Two methods for comparing impact factors and citation rates across fields of science are tested agai...
Using the CD-ROM version of the Science Citation Index 2010 (N = 3,705 journals), we study the (comb...
effects of (a) fractional counting on the impact factor (IF) and (b) transformation of the skewed ci...
The Impact Factors (IFs) of the Institute for Scientific Information suffer from a number of drawbac...
Information suffer from a number of drawbacks, among them the statistics—Why should one use the mean...
In the case of the scientometric evaluation of multi- or interdisciplinary units one risks to compar...
Interest is rising for alterative impact measures derived from Garfield's Journal Impact Factor (JIF...
<p>Since the end of the 1980s, citation impact values – especially for evaluative purposes – are inc...
Since the end of the 1980s, citation impact values –especially for evaluative purposes– are increasi...
AbstractThe interests in journal impact factor (JIF) in scientific communities have grown over the l...
For comparisons of citation impacts across fields and over time, bibliometricians normalize the obse...
We study the problem of normalizing citation impact indicators for differences in citation practices...
For comparisons of citation impacts across fields and over time, bibliometricians normalize the obse...
<p>Evaluative bibliometrics compares the citation impact of researchers, research groups and institu...
normalisation; a priori normalisation; fractional citation; citation network; citation transactions;...
Two methods for comparing impact factors and citation rates across fields of science are tested agai...
Using the CD-ROM version of the Science Citation Index 2010 (N = 3,705 journals), we study the (comb...
effects of (a) fractional counting on the impact factor (IF) and (b) transformation of the skewed ci...
The Impact Factors (IFs) of the Institute for Scientific Information suffer from a number of drawbac...
Information suffer from a number of drawbacks, among them the statistics—Why should one use the mean...
In the case of the scientometric evaluation of multi- or interdisciplinary units one risks to compar...
Interest is rising for alterative impact measures derived from Garfield's Journal Impact Factor (JIF...
<p>Since the end of the 1980s, citation impact values – especially for evaluative purposes – are inc...
Since the end of the 1980s, citation impact values –especially for evaluative purposes– are increasi...
AbstractThe interests in journal impact factor (JIF) in scientific communities have grown over the l...
For comparisons of citation impacts across fields and over time, bibliometricians normalize the obse...
We study the problem of normalizing citation impact indicators for differences in citation practices...
For comparisons of citation impacts across fields and over time, bibliometricians normalize the obse...
<p>Evaluative bibliometrics compares the citation impact of researchers, research groups and institu...
normalisation; a priori normalisation; fractional citation; citation network; citation transactions;...