Add to ORKGconnected to the assessment of research by peers. Evalu-ations by peers can be traced back until the middle of the 17th century. Nowadays, it is recommended for major evaluation contexts to use an informed peer review process where the peers are informed by bibliometric indicators. This review gives a short overview of the practice of peer review and its linking with bibliometrics
The peer review system has been traditionally challenged due to its many limitations especially for ...
The use of peer review within both the scholarly communication system and the UK's research assessme...
Peer review is a central tenet in research across all disciplines. It is a key feature in monitoring...
Peer review is a practice used in the evaluation of scientific and scholarly papers in order to sele...
Evaluation of research uses peer review and bibliometrics, and the debate about their balance in res...
Peer review as the cornerstone of academic quality control has been accused of several biases. As a ...
From today's viewpoint it seems almost inconceivable that there once was a time where academia funct...
National research assessment exercises are becoming regular events in ever more countries. The prese...
The aim of the paper is to control the reliability of peer review when evaluating academic research ...
This open access volume explores peer review in the scientific community and academia. While peer re...
In academia, there is a clear understanding of how the quality of research work is assessed. This is...
Peer review of journal articles is now the norm in virtually all scientific disciplines. The art of ...
A brief historical overview of the origins of peer review reveals that it is neither the best means ...
This review analyses the scholarly literature on peer review, which assess its suitability and relev...
The aim of the paper is to control the reliability of peer review when evaluating academic research ...
The peer review system has been traditionally challenged due to its many limitations especially for ...
The use of peer review within both the scholarly communication system and the UK's research assessme...
Peer review is a central tenet in research across all disciplines. It is a key feature in monitoring...
Peer review is a practice used in the evaluation of scientific and scholarly papers in order to sele...
Evaluation of research uses peer review and bibliometrics, and the debate about their balance in res...
Peer review as the cornerstone of academic quality control has been accused of several biases. As a ...
From today's viewpoint it seems almost inconceivable that there once was a time where academia funct...
National research assessment exercises are becoming regular events in ever more countries. The prese...
The aim of the paper is to control the reliability of peer review when evaluating academic research ...
This open access volume explores peer review in the scientific community and academia. While peer re...
In academia, there is a clear understanding of how the quality of research work is assessed. This is...
Peer review of journal articles is now the norm in virtually all scientific disciplines. The art of ...
A brief historical overview of the origins of peer review reveals that it is neither the best means ...
This review analyses the scholarly literature on peer review, which assess its suitability and relev...
The aim of the paper is to control the reliability of peer review when evaluating academic research ...
The peer review system has been traditionally challenged due to its many limitations especially for ...
The use of peer review within both the scholarly communication system and the UK's research assessme...
Peer review is a central tenet in research across all disciplines. It is a key feature in monitoring...