Abstract—Security APIs, key servers and protocols that need to keep the status of transactions, require to maintain a global, non-monotonic state, e.g., in the form of a database or register. However, existing automated verification tools do not support the analysis of such stateful security protocols – sometimes because of fundamental reasons, such as the encoding of the protocol as Horn clauses, which are inherently monotonic. An exception is the recent tamarin prover which allows specifying protocols as multiset rewrite (msr) rules, a formalism expressive enough to encode state. As multiset rewriting is a “low-level” specification language with no direct support for concurrent message passing, encoding protocols correctly is a difficult ...
When formalizing security protocols, different specification languages support very different reason...
When formalizing security protocols, different specification languages support very different reason...
When formalizing security protocols, different specification languages support very different reason...
Abstract—Security APIs, key servers and protocols that need to keep the status of transactions, requ...
Security APIs, key servers and protocols that need to keep the status of transactions, require to ma...
Security APIs, key servers and protocols that need to keep the status of transactions, require to ...
Security APIs, key servers and protocols that need to keep the status of transactions, require to ma...
International audienceSecurity APIs, key servers and protocols that need to keep the status of trans...
International audienceSecurity APIs, key servers and protocols that need to keep the status of trans...
When formalizing security protocols, different specification languages support very different reason...
When formalizing security protocols, different specification languages support very different reaso...
Abstract. When formalizing security protocols, different specification languages support very differ...
Abstract. When formalizing security protocols, different specification languages support very differ...
When formalizing security protocols, different specification languages support very different reason...
When formalizing security protocols, dierent speci cation languages support very dierent reasoning...
When formalizing security protocols, different specification languages support very different reason...
When formalizing security protocols, different specification languages support very different reason...
When formalizing security protocols, different specification languages support very different reason...
Abstract—Security APIs, key servers and protocols that need to keep the status of transactions, requ...
Security APIs, key servers and protocols that need to keep the status of transactions, require to ma...
Security APIs, key servers and protocols that need to keep the status of transactions, require to ...
Security APIs, key servers and protocols that need to keep the status of transactions, require to ma...
International audienceSecurity APIs, key servers and protocols that need to keep the status of trans...
International audienceSecurity APIs, key servers and protocols that need to keep the status of trans...
When formalizing security protocols, different specification languages support very different reason...
When formalizing security protocols, different specification languages support very different reaso...
Abstract. When formalizing security protocols, different specification languages support very differ...
Abstract. When formalizing security protocols, different specification languages support very differ...
When formalizing security protocols, different specification languages support very different reason...
When formalizing security protocols, dierent speci cation languages support very dierent reasoning...
When formalizing security protocols, different specification languages support very different reason...
When formalizing security protocols, different specification languages support very different reason...
When formalizing security protocols, different specification languages support very different reason...